Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from August, 2025

Lamont: McCarrick ...These things did not happen because of the law of the Church. Until November 27, 1983, the law in force in the Latin Church was the 1917 Code of Canon Law. Canon 2359 §2 of this code decreed that if clerics commit an offense against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue with minors under sixteen years of age, they are to be suspended, declared infamous, deprived of every office, benefice, dignity, or position that they may hold, and in the most grievous cases deposed...origins of this conception of authority and obedience are largely to be found in nominalist theology and philosophy. William of Ockham

https://catholicfamilynews.com/blog/2018/10/27/2018-10-27-tyranny-and-sexual-abuse-in-the-catholic-church-a-jesuit-tragedy/ Tyranny and Sexual Abuse in the Catholic Church: A Jesuit Tragedy Dr. John R. T. Lamont In the light of new revelations about sexual abuse in the Church, many Catholics are asking how the situation that these revelations have disclosed can possibly have come about. The first question that occurs, a question of long standing, is; why did bishops deal with sexual abusers by concealing their offences and moving them to new assignments, rather than by removing them from ministry? No sufficient answer has yet been given to this question. It has now been made more pointed by a further question; how did Theodore McCarrick get appointed as Archbishop of Washington and Cardinal, and even become a principal drafter of the American bishops’ policy on sexual abuse in 2002, when his own involvement in sexual abuse was widely known in clerical circles and had been made known to...

Google AI on "liberty of indifference medieval teachers": Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225–1274) Position: Intellectualist, arguing for "freedom for excellence." vs.Core idea: Scotus argued for the will's complete independence from the intellect's judgments. For Scotus, the will is a self-determining power that can choose or reject any course of action presented to it, no matter how good or rational it appears.

AI Overview In medieval scholasticism, the concept of "liberty of indifference" (liberum arbitrium indifferentiae) describes the will's capacity to choose between different, equally appealing alternatives, unconstrained by external causes or even the intellect . This idea was central to the voluntarist movement, which emphasized the will's power and independence, in contrast to the intellectualist view, which saw the will as determined by the intellect's judgment of the good.   Voluntarists versus intellectualists This debate on the will's nature is a key feature of medieval thought, with two main schools of thought:   Voluntarists : Figures like John Duns Scotus and William of Ockham championed the liberty of indifference. They argued that genuine freedom means the will has the inexplicable power to choose between opposing options, even against the strongest reasons presented by the intellect. This makes the will a self-determining power, or  causa sui . Inte...