Skip to main content

Posts

Fr. Fortin shows that Francis's Amoris Laetitia and Leo support of it are ultimately Machiavellian

It rests on a radical critique of and final break with the entire tradition of ancient and medieval thought. That break, which may have been prepared or facilitated by the emergence of certain late medieval philosophic and theological theories, nominalism in particular, was consummated by Machiavelli toward the beginning of the sixteenth century, a fact that was obscured by subsequent developments and that is still not acknowledged by everyone. A sign of the fundamental shift that takes place at this time is that Aristotle, who became the Western world's supreme authority in matters of political philosophy once the Politics was translated into Latin shortly after the middle of the thirteenth century, is not mentioned at all in The Prince, and, as far as I can see, only twice in passing throughout the rest of Machiavelli's works. This is not to deny that Aristotle is often tacitly referred to in those works, but only to suggest that his seeming absence from them tells us more ab...
Post a Comment
Read more
Recent posts

Nancy drew book chapter 1

CHAPTER I The Lost Will "It would be a shame if all that money went to the HerodsTophams! They will fly higher than ever!" AnitaNancy Drew, a pretty girl of sixteen, leaned over the library table and addressed her father who sat reading a newspaper by the study lamp. "I beg your pardon, AnitaNancy. What were you saying about the HerodsTophams?" FredCarson Drew, a noted criminal and mystery-case lawyer, known far and wide for his work as a former district attorney, looked up from his evening paper and smiled indulgently upon his only daughter. Now, as he gave her his respectful attention, he was not particularly concerned with the Richard HerodTopham family but rather with the rich glow of the lamp upon AnitaNancy's curly golden bob. Not at all the sort of head which one expected to indulge in serious thoughts, he told himself. Mischievously, AnitaNancy reached over and tweaked his ear. "You weren't paying a bit of attention," she accused him sternl...
Post a Comment
Read more

That qualification means that my earlier connection between Wilhelmsen’s philosophy and modern rights theories was an application of his broader philosophical approach, not a verified statement of his specific position on every rights theory. The distinction matters for three reasons: 1. Wilhelmsen’s metaphysics: His Gilsonian Thomism emphasizes esse, the act of existence, and the intelligibility of being. 2. His political philosophy: His account of political authority and the common good must be examined in its own terms, rather than inferred entirely from his metaphysics. 3. Modern rights theories: Whether rights are grounded in human nature, natural law, individual autonomy, or political convention is a further question requiring direct textual evidence. Given your interest in Michel Villey, John Rist, and the classical understanding of justice, the important question is whether Wilhelmsen treats rights as claims grounded in an objective moral order or accepts elements of modern subjective-rights theory. I would not attribute either position to him without examining the relevant passages of Christianity and Political Philosophy. If we pursue this question, the most useful comparison would be Wilhelmsen alongside Villey: does Wilhelmsen's metaphysics lead to a conception of justice centered on objective right and the common good, or does he give a more prominent role to subjective rights?

That qualification means that my earlier connection between Wilhelmsen’s philosophy and modern rights theories was an application of his broader philosophical approach, not a verified statement of his specific position on every rights theory. The distinction matters for three reasons: Wilhelmsen’s metaphysics: His Gilsonian Thomism emphasizes esse, the act of existence, and the intelligibility of being. His political philosophy: His account of political authority and the common good must be examined in its own terms, rather than inferred entirely from his metaphysics. Modern rights theories: Whether rights are grounded in human nature, natural law, individual autonomy, or political convention is a further question requiring direct textual evidence. Given your interest in Michel Villey, John Rist, and the classical understanding of justice, the important question is whether Wilhelmsen treats rights as claims grounded in an objective moral order or accepts elements of modern subjective-r...
Post a Comment
Read more

Orthodoxy: Eighty Years Later By Frederick D. Wilhelmsen

https://media.christendom.edu/1986/08/orthodoxy-eighty-years-later/ Orthodoxy: Eighty Years Later By Frederick D. Wilhelmsen Appeared in 1986, Vol. 12, Nos. 3, 4   Download the PDF here . Every book has a history and the history of my life is the history of a book: Chesterton’s Orthodoxy . In responding to this invitation to write an appreciation of Gilbert Keith Chesterton’s famous work of apologetics, I find it impossible to do so without turning back to my youth. I have read this Christian classic some eighteen times prior to committing myself to this public tribute to its genius. When I was a boy I often haunted second-hand bookstores. One day I pulled out of a shelf a book called Orthodoxy . I had never heard of the author despite my being a student at a Catholic parochial school but I was intrigued by the title. I still own that copy, red cover stamped in gold, old when I bought it. It is laced with my youthful comments. Fortunately they and that book are far from where I wri...
Post a Comment
Read more