Skip to main content

Posts

What is the connection of Pope Pius XI secret sex abuse document and his introducing the modern concept of "social justice" into Catholic social teaching through his 1931 encyclical, Quadragesimo anno.

Google AI:  The connection lies in Pope Pius XI's implementation of two contrasting systems of institutional accountability and governance within a single decade . Through these two distinct actions, he simultaneously expanded the Church’s moral responsibility outward to secular society while drastically sealing its internal operations away from secular eyes. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ] 1. The Contradiction of Scope The Outward Moral Standard ( Quadragesimo anno ): In his 1931 encyclical Quadragesimo anno , Pope Pius XI introduced the modern application of "social justice" and "subsidiarity" into Catholic social teaching. He demanded structural adjustments in the state and economy to protect human dignity, ensuring fair wages, worker rights, and the common good. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ] The Inward Secrecy ( Crimen sollicitationis ): Conversely, in 1922, Pope Pius XI approved a heavily restricted, unpublished Holy Office instruction titled Crimen sollicitationis . This document cod...
Recent posts

Did Social Justice Pope Pius XI start sex abuse cover ups?: Kieran Tapsell’s essay, “Canon Law on Child Abuse Through the Ages.: Pius XI’s instruction Crimen Sollicitationis (1922) made the entire process a secret one from start to finish. Gone were public “degradations” of offenders, in which clerics were stripped of their status and handed over to the state for punishment: in 1922, Pius XI issued his secret instruction Crimen Sollicitationis. On the front page of the document are these words: “To be kept in the secret archive of the Curia for internal use. Not to be published or augmented with commentaries.” The “curia” referred to in this heading is the central office of the bishop’s diocese under the care of the chancellor, who alone was to have the key...The requirement to dismiss for “more serious cases” had become one where dismissal was available only where there was an impossibility of reforming the priest. 62 Information about clerics committing child sexual abuse, homosexuality and bestiality, obtained through the Church’s internal inquiries and trials, was made subject to the “secret of the Holy Office”, a permanent silence, the breach of which incurred automatic excommunication that could only be lifted by the Pope personally.

https://www.catholicsforrenewal.org/old_pages/documents/CanonLawOnChildAbuseThruTheAges.pdf Five years later, in 1922, Pius XI issued his secret instruction Crimen Sollicitationis. On the front page of the document are these words: “To be kept in the secret archive of the Curia for internal use. Not to be published or augmented with commentaries.” The “curia” referred to in this heading is the central office of the bishop’s diocese under the care of the chancellor, who alone was to have the key.59 No one was to have access to this safe without the consent of the bishop, the vicar general or 54 Gasparri, editor, Codicem Iuris Canonici Fontes , Vol. 1, (Vatican, Typis Polyglottis, 1926) N.714-2055, 1123  http://www.awrsipe.com/patrick_wall/selected_documents/1890%20Denunciations%20of%20confessors.pdf . 55 In the revised historical introduction to Sacramentorum Sanctitatis Tutela, Pope Benedict XVI said that strict confidentiality was imposed originally because cases of soliciting in...

Kieran Tapsell’s essay, “Canon Law on Child Abuse Through the Ages.” Tapsell argues that from the time of Gregory XVI in 1842, popes increasingly made the handling of sexual crimes committed by clergy more secretive.: Pius X & Pius XII started sex abuse problem?: The First Code of Canon Law 1917 In 1904, Pope Pius X set up the Pontifical Commission for the Codification of Canon Law under Cardinal Gasparri. His assistant was Monsignor Eugenio Pacelli, the future Pope Pius XII.56 The work of creating the first Code of Canon Law involved adopting, modifying or discarding decrees that the Church thought were relevant or irrelevant for the time...The Code provided that those who sexually abuse children were only to be dismissed in “more serious cases”.58

https://www.catholicsforrenewal.org/old_pages/documents/CanonLawOnChildAbuseThruTheAges.pdf The First Code of Canon Law 1917 In 1904, Pope Pius X set up the Pontifical Commission for the Codification of Canon Law under Cardinal Gasparri. His assistant was Monsignor Eugenio Pacelli, the future Pope Pius XII.56 The work of creating the first Code of Canon Law involved adopting, modifying or discarding decrees that the Church thought were relevant or irrelevant for the time.57 The Commission discarded the decrees of Innocent III, Leo X, Pius IV, St Pius V, the Third, Fourth and Fifth Lateran Councils and the Council of Trent, requiring priests guilty of serious crimes to be degraded and handed over to the civil authorities. The canon law and practice of handing over the priest for punishment in accordance with the civil law was officially abandoned everywhere, and not just for those countries ruled by “schismatics, heretics and Mohammedans”. The Code provided that those who sexually abuse...

Kieran Tapsell’s essay, “Canon Law on Child Abuse Through the Ages.” In the 17th and 18th centuries, the Church’s stand against these priests seemed to be very close to adopting what we might call these days, “zero tolerance”. In 1635 and again in 1726 the Holy See refused to reinstate priests who had served their sentences under the civil law for the sexual abuse of boys.

https://www.catholicsforrenewal.org/old_pages/documents/CanonLawOnChildAbuseThruTheAges.pdf   Church Council and Papal Decrees from the 12th to the 18th Centuries The Church prohibition on clerics issuing sentences that “shed blood” was formalised at the Fourth Lateran Council under Innocent III in 1215CE. Such punishments henceforth were to be carried out by secular authorities.31 A practice then developed requiring clergy sex abusers to be “degraded”, and then handed over to the civil authority to be dealt with by the civil law. The Church still effectively had a veto over a priest being tried by the State for any kind of crime, because unless a priest was “degraded”, he still had the benefit of “privilege of clergy” to be tried only by the ecclesiastical courts. It was this veto that was the centre of the dispute between Henry II and Thomas A’Becket in 1170. 32 The Third Lateran Council in 1179 under Pope Alexander III decreed that clergy guilty of a “crime against nature” were ...

"The AI does not seem to have "understood" that I was also criticizing the classical principles of music, which vary greatly in Pythagoras, Aristotle, Aristoxenus, and Ptolemy, all of whom I critique."

I The breakdown between modern and classical frameworks happens because most thinkers try to force corporeal reality into mathematical containers that were never built to hold it. When mainstream Thomists or followers of figures like Fr. Ripperger encounter modern physics, they often panic. Terrified of being mocked by the scientific community, they split their brains into two isolated compartments: one for traditional philosophy and one for modern science. They accept modern math as an absolute truth without realizing it fundamentally contradicts their own philosophical foundations. This is not just a simple mistake of mixing up abstract math with the real world. It is a fundamental failure of both systems: ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ THE CORPUS (REAL REALITY) │ └───────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────┘ │ ┌────────────────────────┴...