Skip to main content

Posts

The right to sin as the cornerstone of human right?: Al Core claim of Hamish Faser: The writer argues that liberal democracy functions as a means by which modern man is enabled, even incited, to undo the work of redemption.Theological diagnosis: It repudiates the social kingship of the new Adam and proclaims the disobedience of our first parents — framing the Core claim: The speaker argues that liberal democracy functions as a means by which modern man is enabled, even incited, to undo the work of redemption.Theological diagnosis: It repudiates the social kingship of the new Adam and proclaims the disobedience of our first parents — framing the right to sin as the cornerstone of human rights.Societal consequence: This logic produces what the speaker calls a true post-Christian society, where rights are redefined apart from Christian redemption and holiness.Pastoral response (implied): Affirm Christ's social kingship, resist equating rights with a license to sin, and witness to redemptive truth in personal life and public engagement..Societal consequence: This logic produces what the speaker calls a true post-Christian society, where rights are redefined apart from Christian redemption and holiness.Pastoral response (implied): Affirm Christ's social kingship, resist equating rights with a license to sin, and witness to redemptive truth in personal life and public engagement.sist equating rights with a license to sin, and witness to redemptive truth in personal life and public engagement.

Al Core claim of Hamish Faser: The writer argues that liberal democracy functions as a means by which modern man is enabled, even incited, to undo the work of redemption.Theological diagnosis: It repudiates the social kingship of the new Adam and proclaims the disobedience of our first parents — framing the  Core claim: The speaker argues that liberal democracy functions as a means by which modern man is enabled, even incited, to undo the work of redemption.Theological diagnosis: It repudiates the social kingship of the new Adam and proclaims the disobedience of our first parents — framing the right to sin as the cornerstone of human rights.Societal consequence: This logic produces what the speaker calls a true post-Christian society, where rights are redefined apart from Christian redemption and holiness.Pastoral response (implied): Affirm Christ's social kingship, resist equating rights with a license to sin, and witness to redemptive truth in personal life and public engagement....
Recent posts

Liberal democracy is simply— Original Sin, plural. For it is a means whereby modern man is enabled, even incited, to undo the work of redemption by repudiating the social kingsship of the new Adam and by proclaiming the ungenerated disobedience of our first parents, i.e., the right to sin, as the cornerstone inspiration of all human rights properly understood, i.e.,of all such rights as are deemed to be acceptable for a true post-Christian society.

Liberal democracy is simply— Original Sin, plural. For it is a means whereby modern man is enabled, even incited, to undo the work of redemption by repudiating the social Kingship of the New Adam and by proclaiming the unregenerate disobedience of our First Parents, i.e., the right to sin, as the cornerstone inspiration of all human rights properly understood, i.e.,of all such rights as are deemed to be acceptable for a true post-Christian society. - Hamish Fraser

Johnny St.Pete @JohnMcCloy 🔥🤔 Joe Kent says something with President Trump’s mentality changed in Spring/Summer of early 2025. He correct. I said it was right around the time Elon Musk was forced out & following the Tesla vandalizations & firebombings. The Uniparty was terrified of Musk uncovering their shenanigans so they activated their terror network to cause chaos. He’s also correct about the CLEAR breaches in his security such as when he went to Joe’s Seafood in D.C. and Code Pink ambushed him. Who leaked that information to them? Keep in mind… Neville Singham’s wife is a co- founder of Code Pink) AND the U.N. escalator stop incident. Many of us lost our sh*t over those 2 incidents. Kent also says the President IS EXCELLENT at taking in large amounts of information and making decisions. Correct. I’ve been saying since July that it’s as if he surrounded by bad advice & fire-walled from information which is not heavily curated. Trump has excellent instincts. Kent also notes to @juliandorey that Charlie Kirk was assassinated in broad daylight. I want to reminded everyone… the restaurant Code Pink ambushed was 9/9/25.The day before Charlie. I want to point out Singham has ties to the Queers of SALT LAKE CITY network. The entire interview is on YouTube. Julian is great at securing excellent guests and the guy knows his stuff. 1:10 / 4:03 3:02 PM · Jul 20, 2026 · 642.4K Views

Johnny St.Pete @JohnMcCloy Joe Kent says something with President Trump’s mentality changed in Spring/Summer of early 2025. He correct. I said it was right around the time Elon Musk was forced out & following the Tesla vandalizations & firebombings. The Uniparty was terrified of Musk uncovering their shenanigans so they activated their terror network to cause chaos. He’s also correct about the CLEAR breaches in his security such as when he went to Joe’s Seafood in D.C. and Code Pink ambushed him. Who leaked that information to them? Keep in mind… Neville Singham’s wife is a co- founder of Code Pink) AND the U.N. escalator stop incident. Many of us lost our sh*t over those 2 incidents. Kent also says the President IS EXCELLENT at taking in large amounts of information and making decisions. Correct. I’ve been saying since July that it’s as if he surrounded by bad advice & fire-walled from information which is not heavily curated. Trump has excellent instincts. ...

I think he has good points worth thinking about with a grain of salt, but I've talked to him and suspect him overstates his many of his points including thinking Cardinal Burke is homosexual: HISTORICAL IMPACT OF HOMOSEXUAL POPES Questions worth answering Gene Thomas Gomulka "hard time convincing Catholics that John Paul II would have promulgated a document like Fiducia Supplicans that allows for the blessing of same-sex couples"

THE HISTORICAL IMPACT OF HOMOSEXUAL POPES Questions worth answering Gene Thomas Gomulka Jul 26   READ IN APP   It should be obvious that the Catholic Church under Saint John Paul II was very different from the Church under Pope Francis and Pope Leo. Might the difference have to do in part with the fact that John Paul II lived as a diocesan priest before his papal election, whereas Francis and Leo were members of religious orders (i.e., Jesuits, Augustinians) that traditionally have been populated with higher numbers of homosexuals? Anyone who might question the perceived homosexual orientation of Pope Francis and Pope Leo would have a hard time convincing Catholics that John Paul II would have promulgated a document like  Fiducia Supplicans  that allows for the blessing of same-sex couples. Consider also that JP II appointed the future Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and that Pope Francis not on...