Skip to main content

Posts

Villey traced the origin of "rights talk" (specifically the notion of ius as a subjective power or right of an individual) to the 14th-century nominalist theology of William of Ockham. "Deformed" Tradition: He contended that while this development stemmed from Christian thought, it was a "deformed" or "aberrant" variety. He argued that it abandoned the objective, cosmic justice of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas—where law is an objective, fair, and orderly arrangement of things—in favor of subjective, individualistic "rights". A "Deformed" Variety: Villey believed these rights were "unreal, contradictory

AI Overview Yes, this accurately represents the views of French legal philosopher  Michel Villey  (1914–1988). Villey, a leading 20th-century proponent of natural law (specifically a Thomist-Aristotelian approach), argued that the modern concept of subjective rights ( droits de l'homme ) was a perversion of classical and Christian thought.   Here are the key points of his argument: Derivation from Late Medieval Christianity:  Villey traced the origin of "rights talk" (specifically the notion of  ius  as a subjective power or right of an individual) to the 14th-century nominalist theology of  William of Ockham . "Deformed" Tradition:  He contended that while this development stemmed from Christian thought, it was a "deformed" or "aberrant" variety. He argued that it abandoned the objective, cosmic justice of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas—where law is an objective, fair, and orderly arrangement of things—in favor of subjective, individualistic ...
Post a Comment
Read more
Recent posts

The SSPX Confronts Rome: the Consecrations are Scheduled for July 1 T. S. Flanders February 2, 2026

Author’s note: I dedicate these words to my editor-in-chief, the Immaculata. May she open all hearts to reconcile with brothers and unite in the one faith and one truth of Christ in His One Church, the Holy Roman Catholic Church. O Theotokos,  softener of evil hearts , by your sorrows and tears, I beg you to reconcile brothers in Christ. The announcement has finally come that the SSPX intends to consecrate bishops this year. The press release is very short so let’s read the whole thing. From  their website : Advertisement - Continue Reading Below — Press release dated 2 February 2026. On 2 February 2026, the feast of the Purification of the Blessed Virgin, the Reverend Father Davide Pagliarani, Superior General of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X, during the ceremony of the taking of the cassock which he presided over at the International Seminary of Saint-Curé-d’Ars in Flavigny-sur-Ozerain, France, publicly announced his decision to entrust the bishops of the Society with...
Post a Comment
Read more

AI: Ripperger's Focus: The search results indicate that Fr. Chad Ripperger focuses on traditional Catholic theology, the state of the Church, and "generational spirits". In a discussion about modern, "anthropocentric" (human-centered) views—where the human is treated as the ultimate truth—some traditionalist perspectives (including those often discussed in relation to Ripperger) argue that the "hyper-civilized" approach tends to reject anything outside human autonomy. The Conflict: Critics of modern Catholic philosophy often argue that it has shifted away from a strictly theocentric (God-centered) view to a more humanitarian one. While Maritain himself defended a rigorous, spiritual, and Thomistic approach, his emphasis on "Integral Humanism" and the "human person" has been critiqued by some traditionalists as allowing for a shift in focus from the divine to the human.

Ripperger's Focus:  The search results indicate that Fr. Chad Ripperger focuses on traditional Catholic theology, the state of the Church, and "generational spirits". In a discussion about modern, "anthropocentric" (human-centered) views—where the human is treated as the ultimate truth—some traditionalist perspectives (including those often discussed in relation to Ripperger) argue that the "hyper-civilized" approach tends to reject anything outside human autonomy. The Conflict:  Critics of modern Catholic philosophy often argue that it has shifted away from a strictly theocentric (God-centered) view to a more humanitarian one. While Maritain himself defended a rigorous, spiritual, and Thomistic approach, his emphasis on "Integral Humanism" and the "human person" has been critiqued by some traditionalists as allowing for a shift in focus from the divine to the human.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Mary M. Keys has suggested...that while Charles De Koninck...De Koninck focused on a more traditional reading of rational nature, while Maritain [my read: Kantian autonomy] sought to secure the autonomy of the individual and personal freedom

Mary M. Keys has suggested that while Charles De Koninck and Jacques Maritain both addressed the common good, they did so from different foundational emphases:  De Koninck focused on a more traditional reading of  rational nature , while Maritain sought to secure the  autonomy of the individual  and personal freedom
Post a Comment
Read more

From personalism to liberalism? Villey & Lamont & Kraynak show it appears to be disguised Kantianism and NOT>: Carrying this logic one step further, it may also be possible to challenge the assumption that the conception of human rights that prevails today is indeed as internally homogenous as Moyn suggests when he claims that, after the “death of Christian Europe” human rights were reinvented along the lines of an essentially neo-Kantian philosophy. Perhaps if human rights remain so widely discussed and influential today it is precisely because the basic tension we uncovered at the heart of Maritain’s thought—between a Christian (or conservative) conception of human rights and a liberal or individualist one—remains yet to be resolved.

https://tif.ssrc.org/2015/06/11/from-personalism-to-liberalism/#:~:text=Maritain's%20starting%20point%20is%20the,ground%20is%20always%20the%20same.  personalism to liberalism? by  Carlo Invernizzi Accetti June 11, 2015 Print In his paper “ Personalism, Community and the Origins of Human Rights ,” Samuel Moyn argues that a relatively understudied current of Catholic political thought—known as personalism—played a key role in the affirmation of human rights as today’s dominant ideological framework. This may initially appear surprising given the well-known opposition of traditional Catholic social doctrine to the values normally associated with liberalism, modernity and the French Revolution. 1 Moyn’s argument, however, is that Catholic political thought underwent a transformation in the middle of the twentieth century, developing a distinctive doctrine of human rights on the basis of a concept of the human “person,” which turned out to be crucial for the inscription of human ri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Google AL: Maritain sought to secure the autonomy of the individual and personal freedom.

Jacques Maritain defined  freedom of choice  (free will) as a means, not an end, that should be used to attain " freedom of autonomy " or "freedom of exultation" (independence/mastery of self). He argued that true freedom is the expansion of the human person, achieved when freedom of choice is used to align oneself with goodness.   Key aspects of Maritain's distinction: Freedom of Choice  (Freedom from Necessity):  This is the basic, initial freedom of the will to choose between alternatives, including the ability to choose evil. Freedom of Autonomy  (Terminal Freedom/Exultation):  This is the higher, ultimate freedom that comes with spiritual and moral maturity, where one acts according to their own rational nature in accordance with the good. The Goal:  The purpose of freedom of choice is to be used, through correct moral decisions, to conquer or achieve this state of full autonomy, or independence from external constraints and internal disorder...
Post a Comment
Read more