Skip to main content

Posts

Fernando Play... Fernando: Sing, little creatures of God, sing, cover the sound of our hidden advance to the great walls of Quesada.

Fernando Play Venue :   Theater at Catholic High School or University. Curtain opens.   NARRATOR addresses theater audience. NARRATOR:   Understand we have students from Social Studies and Religion classes in the audience today.  NARRATOR:   Good.  Then I shall begin with a question?  In the reconquest of Spain.  Can you name the person or persons who drove the Moors out of Spain. AUDIENCE:  Chorus - Ferdinand & Isabella, 1492.  Any more questions. (Laughter) NARRATOR:  True. , but only one Kingdom--Granada.  Who drove the Moors out of the vast majority of Spain 200 years before Ferdinand & Isabella?  Who recaptured almost all of Spain and  several major cities including the 2 most important supposedly unconquerable Moorish strongholds Cordoba  and Seville?  If you don't know, that's OK. Very few students or even teachers do. His name was Fernado, a youth of 18 years of age. He would be kno...
Recent posts

AI Google [Thomism vs] The claim that [Suarez's] "only individual, distinct entities exist in reality" represents a form of strict nominalism or ontological individualism. It strictly rejects the existence of universal concepts outside the mind. In stark contrast, Thomism (the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas) champions a nuanced metaphysical realism. Thomism argues that distinct, individual entities do indeed exist, but they are intrinsically united by objective, shared essences (natures) that are independent of human thought.The clash between these two worldviews hinges on the structure of reality:1. The Reality of UniversalsStrict Individualism (Nominalism): Claims that "universal" categories (like "humanity" or "dog-ness") are merely words or mental constructs used to group similar objects. In reality, only this specific dog or that specific human exists.Thomism (Aristotelian Realism): Argues that universal natures truly exist, not as independent, floating abstractions (Platonic forms), but in the individual things themselves (universalia in rebus). When you see multiple distinct trees, they share the exact same structural essence of "treeness," and your intellect accurately grasps this objective reality.2. Hylomorphism: Form vs. MatterStrict Individualism: Often views an object simply as a "lump" of matter, or a collection of smaller parts that happen to be assembled together.Thomism: Explains distinct entities through hylomorphism. Every individual substance is a composite of form (what makes a thing what it is) and matter (the raw material that receives the form). It is the form that gives an entity its distinct, unified existence, organizing its parts toward specific ends.3. The Essence and Existence DistinctionStrict Individualism: Tends to collapse existence and essence into the same thing; if a distinct entity is real, its "whatness" is simply a property of its physical existence.Thomism: Makes a critical real distinction between a thing's essence (its definition, or what it is) and its existence (the act of being, or that it is) in all created things. Because you can understand exactly what a unicorn is without knowing if it actually exists, Thomists argue essence and existence must be distinct principles.4. Teleology (Purpose)Strict Individualism: Usually rejects the idea that objects have built-in purposes or goals. Things act simply because of the mechanical laws of their physical parts.Thomism: Asserts that because entities possess a distinct essence, they also have inherent natural tendencies or ends (teleology). Individual entities are not just collections of parts; they are integrated wholes actively striving to fulfill their nature.To learn more about Thomas Aquinas's metaphysics and how they resolve the problem of universals, explore the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy or delve into the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

The claim that "only individual, distinct entities exist in reality" represents a form of strict nominalism or ontological individualism. It strictly rejects the existence of universal concepts outside the mind. In stark contrast, Thomism (the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas) champions a nuanced metaphysical realism . Thomism argues that distinct, individual entities do indeed exist, but they are intrinsically united by objective, shared essences (natures) that are independent of human thought. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ] The clash between these two worldviews hinges on the structure of reality: 1. The Reality of Universals Strict Individualism (Nominalism): Claims that "universal" categories (like "humanity" or "dog-ness") are merely words or mental constructs used to group similar objects. In reality, only this specific dog or that specific human exists. Thomism (Aristotelian Realism): Argues that universal natures truly exist, not as independent, flo...

AI Overview [Kant & Descartes children of] Francisco Suárez (1548–1617) is widely acknowledged as a crucial intellectual bridge between medieval scholasticism and early modern philosophy. While not a "semi-nominalist" (his system is heavily influenced by Scotist realism alongside nominalist and Thomist elements), he significantly shaped Descartes' and Kant's turn toward the mind. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy +2 Francisco Suárez: The "First Modern" Suárez's monumental 1597 work, Metaphysical Disputations (Disputationes Metaphysicae), reorganized Aristotelian philosophy into a comprehensive, systematic ontology. Because Suárez extensively collected and adapted the full scope of medieval philosophy, historians like Martin Heidegger have pointed to him as a profound structural influence on later modern thought. Marquette University +3 Suárez and René Descartes Descartes studied at the Jesuit college of La Flèche and absorbed Suárez's frameworks. Cambridge University Press & Assessment The "Turn Inward": Following Suárez's method of relying on "intra-mental concepts" to establish objective certainty, Descartes built his philosophy on the internal clarity of "clear and distinct ideas". Conceptual Distinctions: Descartes’ methodology for isolating mind from body derives directly from Suárez's extensive treatises on "distinctions" (real, modal, and rational). Theory and History of Ontology +2 Suárez and Immanuel Kant Kant’s "turn inward" (often called the Copernican turn in philosophy) shifts the focus from how the world is structured objectively to how the human mind structures its experience of the world. Being as a Position: Kant’s famous thesis that "existence is not a real predicate" is grounded in similar arguments developed by Suárez regarding possibility, essence, and existence. Ontological Frameworks: The overall categorical framework Kant utilized in his Critique of Pure Reason reflects the enduring structural legacy of Suárez’s systematic metaphysics. Marquette University +2 Explore more about Suárez's synthesis of the scholastic tradition on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy or trace his direct impact on Cartesian ontology through The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon.

AI Overview Francisco Suárez (1548–1617) is widely acknowledged as a crucial intellectual bridge between medieval scholasticism and early modern philosophy. While not a "semi-nominalist" (his system is heavily influenced by Scotist realism alongside nominalist and Thomist elements), he significantly shaped Descartes' and Kant's turn toward the mind.   Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy  +2 Francisco Suárez: The "First Modern" Suárez's monumental 1597 work,  Metaphysical Disputations  ( Disputationes Metaphysicae ), reorganized Aristotelian philosophy into a comprehensive, systematic ontology. Because Suárez extensively collected and adapted the full scope of medieval philosophy, historians like Martin Heidegger have pointed to him as a profound structural influence on later modern thought.   Marquette University  +3 Suárez and René Descartes Descartes studied at the Jesuit college of La Flèche and absorbed Suárez's frameworks.   Cambridge University...