Skip to main content

Posts

Capsaicin inhibits Porphyromonas gingivalis growth, biofilm formation, gingivomucosal inflammatory cytokine secretion, and in vitro osteoclastogenesis |

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255975070_Capsaicin_inhibits_Porphyromonas_gingivalis_growth_biofilm_formation_gingivomucosal_inflammatory_cytokine_secretion_and_in_vitro_osteoclastogenesis   The prevention and treatment of periodontitis requires not only the control of causative pathogens, especially Porphyromonas gingivalis, but also the regulation of inflammatory immune response. Investigating auxiliary drugs for periodontitis during conventional treatments is, thus, quite important. Capsaicin, an agonist for the vanilloid receptor subtype 1 (TRPV1), due to its bacteriostatic activity against Gram-negative bacteria and anti-inflammatory effects, appears to be a promising drug. In this work, the antimicrobial activity of capsaicin against P. gingivalis and biofilm formation, inflammatory cytokine levels in experimental periodontitis, osteoclast precursor proliferation, and osteoclastogenesis in vitro were fully investigated. The results showed that capsaicin inhibited P. gin
Recent posts

Fenton: St Robert Bellarmine tried to prove that iit was not necessary to suppose that the other apostles had received ? their jurisdiction immediately from St Peter in order to hold that j all the other residential bishops of the Catholic Church derived their | power of jurisdiction immediately from the Roman Pontiff

https://isidore.co/misc/Res%20pro%20Deo/TheCatholicArchive_OCRed/Image_and_OCR_layers/%E2%80%9CSt.%20Peter%20and%20Apostolic%20Jurisdiction%E2%80%9D%20The%20A.E.R.%20Msgr.%20Joseph%20Fenton.pdf ST. PETER AND APOSTOLIC JURISDICTION The Holy Father’s action in teaching that the bishops of the Catholic Church receive their power of jurisdiction from Our Lord through the Roman Pontiff rather than immediately from the Saviour Himself must inevitably focus the attention of theologians upon a question intimately related to that of the immediate source of episcopal jurisdiction. Theologians must look with renewed interest upon that section of their science which deals with the immediate source of that power of jurisdiction within the kingdom of God on earth enjoyed by the apostles themselves. Did the original members of the apostolic collegium receive their power of jurisdiction over the faithful immediately from Our Lord or did they possess it as something coming to them from Christ through P

Joseph Clifford Fenton: EPISCOPAL JURISDICTION AND THE ROMAN SEE

http://www.the-pope.com/fenton1.html EPISCOPAL JURISDICTION AND THE ROMAN SEE from the American Ecclesiastical Review Vol. CXX, Jan.-Jun. 1949      One of the most important contributions to sacred theology in recent years is to be found in the Holy Father's teaching about the immediate source of episcopal jurisdiction within the Catholic Church.  In his great encyclical letter  Mystici corporis , issued June 29, 1943, Pope Pius XII spoke of the ordinary power of jurisdiction of the other Catholic bishops as something "bestowed upon them immediately" by the Sovereign Pontiff.[1]  More than a year before the publication of the  Mystici corporis  the Holy Father brought out the same truth in his pastoral allocution to the parish priests and the Lenten preachers of Rome.  In this address he taught that the Vicar of Christ on earth is the one from whom all the other pastors in the Catholic Church "receive immediately their jurisdiction and their mission."[2]      In

Palmieri thus characterises the moderate view: It is asserted that the Roman Pontiff cannot licitly and validly remove or restrict the jurisdiction of a bishop without just cause: once the condition of the Roman Pontiff having assigned subjects to a bishop is satisfied, the jurisdiction received by bishops is given by God, for it is this jurisdiction of divine origin that is exercised. The Roman Pontiff may indeed regulate and modify this jurisdiction for reasons derived from just causes. He can even in certain cases declare that this jurisdiction has been lost, in virtue of his right to interpret divine law. He cannot however directly remove jurisdiction from a bishop, because this jurisdiction does not exist in its subject through him, but by divine law; and divine law takes precedence over papal authority.

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2023/12/on-papal-deposition-of-bishops-dr-john.html

In attempting to remove Bp. Strickland without good reason, Pope Francis was breaking the divine law. He was not just breaking the moral law established by God; he was also breaking the public divine law established by Christ to govern the Church. Those who break this public divine law are criminals; Pope Francis is therefore a criminal. This will not be a surprise to those whom have studied Pope Francis’s career.

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2023/12/on-papal-deposition-of-bishops-dr-john.html

These [PPXII] papal assertions cannot be said to settle the question. The issue is a debate between different schools of Catholic theology that lasted for centuries. Both sides of this debate were strongly argued for at an ecumenical council, the Council of Trent,[16] and no agreement was arrived at. It is a question of the first importance that concerns the fundamental structure of the Church. In order to end a dispute of this kind by a magisterial intervention, such an intervention must clearly describe the question, express the intention of settling it, specify the position being taught, and make it clear that the teaching is binding on all Catholics. Of the texts cited above, only the encyclical Mystici corporis could satisfy these criteria

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2023/12/on-papal-deposition-of-bishops-dr-john.html

Pope jurisdiction over bishops & Vat I: The actions of Pius VII in Tam Multa and Qui Christi domini thus cannot be used to sustain the thesis that the pope has the right to remove diocesan bishops at will. The sequel to this episode is extremely important for our question. Abp. Deschamps of Malines presented a postulatum to the First Vatican Council in 1870 in connection with the ‘Petite Église’. He requested a formal condemnation of this movement as schismatic. He proposed an amendment to the Council’s chapter on the Roman primacy that would assert the pope’s power to suppress dioceses, and supported this amendment by reference to Pius VII’s actions in 1801.[17] (See E. Mangenot, ‘Anticoncordataires’, DTC 1/1, col. 1377). The Council Fathers refused to accept this amendment.[18] This claim about papal power therefore cannot be described as having been taught by the First Vatican Council. The Council chose not to include this claim in its description of papal primacy when asked to do so.

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2023/12/on-papal-deposition-of-bishops-dr-john.html

Here Vitoria states that the bishops who succeeded the apostles could and did name their successors on their own authority, without having recourse to the pope. This is a rejection of the strong view of papal jurisdiction, since it asserts that episcopal jurisdiction can and has existed without having been received from the pope. Vitoria holds that the power of episcopal jurisdiction is received directly from God, citing Ephesians 4 to this effect. That is why Vitoria has always been cited by Catholic theologians as an opponent of the strong view of papal jurisdiction, as appears from the mention of him in the excerpt from the Dictionnaire de théologie catholique given above.

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2024/03/in-defense-of-moderate-position-on.html

The Council of Trent states not only that the episcopal order exists in right of the authority of Christ, as Palmieri says, but also that the individual bishop of a diocese has by divine right a power of jurisdiction over his diocese that is conferred on him by the Holy Spirit, and that he is one of the successors of the apostles. It is difficult to see how this can be reconciled with Palmieri’s view that all power by which the Church is ruled is either formally or virtually included in the papal power of jurisdiction.

Back Keep as New Move Delete Spam More ( No Subject ) Aol / Sent mrtnzfred@aol.com   From: mrtnzfred@aol.com To: FRED MARTINEZ Fri, Mar 15 at 7:43 PM Fri, Mar 15 at 7:43 PM In Defense of the Moderate Position on Papal Jurisdiction Rorate Caeli https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com  › 2024/03 › in-defense-...  Defense of the Moderate Position on Papal Jurisdiction Rorate Caeli https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com  › 2024/03 › in-defense-...