Please read Paul Cameron's letter below to see why as the US continues along the Gay agenda we are not far behind Europe.
Fred
Traditionally, good citizens did three things:1) produced more stuff than they consumed.2) obeyed laws and customs.3) raised children in marriage.
An ever-growing fraction of citizens are choosing not to have children, thereby ‘leaching’ off the efforts of those who do. Among this fraction, homosexuals stand out.
Winning social approval in spite their sexual activity, they gain an important exemption – they don’t have to do the hard work of producing and raising children because they just don’t feel like it . They would rather follow their sexual desires, or pursue alternatives open to the unencumbered.
Homosexuals participate in and reinforce the notion that sexuality is primarily, if not exclusively, recreational.
They exemplify the ‘childless by choice,’ and as such, constitute both an index and a cause of childlessness. An index because the proportion of those never-married aged 30-34 has gone up from less than 8% in 1970 to 28% today. A cause, because many reason, even if subconsciously -- ‘if gays can be good citizens without holding up their part of the sky, why should I?”
Homosexuals strain society in a number of ways. While they are healthy they contribute less to the production of stuff because they miss work more frequently. And, because their lifespans are reduced by about 20 years, they tend not to put in a full work career (which is 35 years in the U.S.) either.
But homosexuality is worse still. Besides not contributing their full measure of stuff, they also siphon extra stuff from society. Gays, in particular, are subject to a number of extravagantly expensive diseases.
Take just one -- HIV infection. Currently, our society spends about 100 billion dollars/year on the ‘prevention,’ cure, and care of those suffering from HIV.
Gays account for about 60% of HIV expenditures. Why? Because HIV doesn’t fall off trees or lurk on toilet seats -- you usually get HIV by engaging in ‘gay delight’ -- penile-rectal sex. Gays and lesbians also get a host of other STDs – many of which are costly due to the need for blood transfusions, medicines, or hospitalizations.
All this, and their activities don’t produce children! It’s hard to definitively quantify just how much extra homosexuals cost society. But it is unlikely that they average less than an extra $15,000/year apiece. The Centers for Disease Control has figured out that people who smoke cost an extra $168 billion a year – given 22 million smokers, an average of $3,700 per smoker.
But smokers have almost the same number of kids as non-smokers. So while smokers cost society more than non-smokers, their overall contribution is substantial. As a group, smokers are a net gain for society.
The same cannot be said of homosexuals (or IV drug abusers), they are a net loss. Homosexuals create yet another social cost – and it is a large one. They disproportionately sexually involve themselves with the underage.
For instance, when it comes to foster parents, about a third of the substantiated cases of foster child sexual abuse are committed by homosexuals.http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/eletters/118/ 1/349
Between a quarter and a third of teacher-pupil molestations are homosexual (P Cameron, K Cameron, Do Homosexual Teachers Pose a Risk to Pupils? Journal of Psychology 1996;130:603-613).
Elton John is a not only a moocher, he is a spoiled brat moocher who deliberately tries to further harm society. As a merchant of death, he richly deserves opprobrium. In the present demographic crisis, where Europe is dying before our very eyes in large part due to the philosophy he espouses, he deserves worse than opprobrium.
Paul Cameron, Ph.D. Chairman, Family Research Institute Colorado Springs, CO303 681 3113
Click here for Credit Card and Amazon Order of Fred Martinez's book "Hidden Axis":
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1410746186/qid=1099936755/sr=11-1/ref
Fred
Traditionally, good citizens did three things:1) produced more stuff than they consumed.2) obeyed laws and customs.3) raised children in marriage.
An ever-growing fraction of citizens are choosing not to have children, thereby ‘leaching’ off the efforts of those who do. Among this fraction, homosexuals stand out.
Winning social approval in spite their sexual activity, they gain an important exemption – they don’t have to do the hard work of producing and raising children because they just don’t feel like it . They would rather follow their sexual desires, or pursue alternatives open to the unencumbered.
Homosexuals participate in and reinforce the notion that sexuality is primarily, if not exclusively, recreational.
They exemplify the ‘childless by choice,’ and as such, constitute both an index and a cause of childlessness. An index because the proportion of those never-married aged 30-34 has gone up from less than 8% in 1970 to 28% today. A cause, because many reason, even if subconsciously -- ‘if gays can be good citizens without holding up their part of the sky, why should I?”
Homosexuals strain society in a number of ways. While they are healthy they contribute less to the production of stuff because they miss work more frequently. And, because their lifespans are reduced by about 20 years, they tend not to put in a full work career (which is 35 years in the U.S.) either.
But homosexuality is worse still. Besides not contributing their full measure of stuff, they also siphon extra stuff from society. Gays, in particular, are subject to a number of extravagantly expensive diseases.
Take just one -- HIV infection. Currently, our society spends about 100 billion dollars/year on the ‘prevention,’ cure, and care of those suffering from HIV.
Gays account for about 60% of HIV expenditures. Why? Because HIV doesn’t fall off trees or lurk on toilet seats -- you usually get HIV by engaging in ‘gay delight’ -- penile-rectal sex. Gays and lesbians also get a host of other STDs – many of which are costly due to the need for blood transfusions, medicines, or hospitalizations.
All this, and their activities don’t produce children! It’s hard to definitively quantify just how much extra homosexuals cost society. But it is unlikely that they average less than an extra $15,000/year apiece. The Centers for Disease Control has figured out that people who smoke cost an extra $168 billion a year – given 22 million smokers, an average of $3,700 per smoker.
But smokers have almost the same number of kids as non-smokers. So while smokers cost society more than non-smokers, their overall contribution is substantial. As a group, smokers are a net gain for society.
The same cannot be said of homosexuals (or IV drug abusers), they are a net loss. Homosexuals create yet another social cost – and it is a large one. They disproportionately sexually involve themselves with the underage.
For instance, when it comes to foster parents, about a third of the substantiated cases of foster child sexual abuse are committed by homosexuals.http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/eletters/118/ 1/349
Between a quarter and a third of teacher-pupil molestations are homosexual (P Cameron, K Cameron, Do Homosexual Teachers Pose a Risk to Pupils? Journal of Psychology 1996;130:603-613).
Elton John is a not only a moocher, he is a spoiled brat moocher who deliberately tries to further harm society. As a merchant of death, he richly deserves opprobrium. In the present demographic crisis, where Europe is dying before our very eyes in large part due to the philosophy he espouses, he deserves worse than opprobrium.
Paul Cameron, Ph.D. Chairman, Family Research Institute Colorado Springs, CO303 681 3113
Click here for Credit Card and Amazon Order of Fred Martinez's book "Hidden Axis":
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1410746186/qid=1099936755/sr=11-1/ref
Comments