Do Shea & Giunta think the Naked Images could be the Naked Blessed Mother & Francis is "Indefatigably Ignorant" for calling them "Pachamama"?
Renew America writer Eric Giunta who has written for the the Catholic Herald in his blasphemous claim that the naked images that were bowed down to in the Vatican gardens might be images of the Blessed Virgin Mary said:
"[I]t is unclear whether this indigenous icon of a [naked] pregnant woman is a [naked] representation of the Mother of Jesus, or... 'life, fertility, [and/or]Mother Earth.'"
"... [T]he indefatigably ignorant Pope Francis... referred to the stolen and desecrated images as 'pachamama.'"
(Laboravi Sustinens, "No, 'Mother Earth' Is Not 'Pagan,'" no date given)
It appears that Mark Shea agrees with the Giunta blasphemous post that claims the naked images could be the naked Blessed Mother since he promoted the above post by him and said:
"Giunta is no fan of Pope Francis by any stretch. But he is honest and he recognizes a Right Wing Lie [which "the indefatigably ignorant Pope Francis [called]... 'pachamama'" not Mary or Mother Earth]."
(Catholic and Enjoying it, "Hard Core Traditionalist Eric Giunta Rebuts the 'Pachamama' Nonsense One Last Time," November 27, 2019)
Does Shea thinks Francis is a liar or "indefatigably ignorant" for admitting the naked images are 'pachamama'?
Apparently, Shea blasphemously thinks the naked images could be naked images of the Blessed Virgin Mary despite what Francis said.
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.