Do Shea & Giunta think the Naked Images could be the Naked Blessed Mother & Francis is "Indefatigably Ignorant" for calling them "Pachamama"?
Renew America writer Eric Giunta who has written for the the Catholic
Herald in his blasphemous claim that the naked images that were bowed
down to in the Vatican gardens might be images of the Blessed Virgin
Mary said:
"[I]t is unclear whether this indigenous icon of a [naked] pregnant
woman is a [naked] representation of the Mother of Jesus, or... 'life,
fertility, [and/or]Mother Earth.'"
"... [T]he indefatigably ignorant Pope Francis... referred to the stolen and desecrated images as 'pachamama.'"
(Laboravi Sustinens, "No, 'Mother Earth' Is Not 'Pagan,'" no date given)
It appears that Mark Shea agrees with the Giunta blasphemous post that
claims the naked images could be the naked Blessed Mother since he
promoted the above post by him and said:
"Giunta is no fan of Pope Francis by any stretch. But he is honest and
he recognizes a Right Wing Lie [which "the indefatigably ignorant Pope
Francis [called]... 'pachamama'" not Mary or Mother Earth]."
(Catholic and Enjoying it, "Hard Core Traditionalist Eric Giunta Rebuts
the 'Pachamama' Nonsense One Last Time," November 27, 2019)
Does Shea thinks Francis is a liar or "indefatigably ignorant" for admitting the naked images are 'pachamama'?
Apparently, Shea blasphemously thinks the naked images could be naked
images of the Blessed Virgin Mary despite what Francis said.
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.
Comments