Skip to main content

The Coronavirus Masked "Herdist" and their "Frenzied Mass Hysteria"

Aqua said…
“If you accept a vaccine from a known eugenicist who wants to depopulate the world, your brainwashing is complete.”

Anne Barnhardt has done some studies on the nano technology that will be used to tag every human being in the planet via the “Quantum Dot ID, using an enzyme called .... Luciferace (!). Not very subtle, are they? This will be a permanent part of your body and makes you trackable, not just your person, but your activity and compliance.

From a re-tweet from Laurence England’s account, Henry Makow observes “Microsoft’s patent for nano technology microchipping (link below). It can be administered with a vaccine and is ready to go. It has multiple applications such as commerce, medical information, passport, almost anything, it’s accessible via scanning.“

Then, clicking his link, we find the patent, applied for by “Microsoft Technology Licensing”:

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606

They are connecting this “nano tech” as the mechanism only through which we can buy and sell via cryptocurrency! You don’t get the “Quantum Dot with Luciferace, you can’t buy or sell ... anything, assuming cryptocurrency replaces paper currency.

This is starting to make sense, from this perspective (to me). And I am getting the distinct impression, President Trump is part of this.
Fred Martinez said…
Good info.

How do you think Trump "is part of this"?
Aqua said…
“How do you think Trump "is part of this"?“

I don’t know. He called it. He did it. He’s the President, he didn’t have to shut us down; didn’t have to agree to the premise that a virus can shut America down and bring us to our knees. But he did. He is fully invested in this logic: a virus can overwhelm America in a day. He put us in house arrest. He declared the emergency and used emergency powers to override Constitutional rights for us and restrictions for him. Now the governors have followed that emergency powers lead, eliminating our fundamental Constitutional rights and their normal balance of power government.

What I worry about the most is the *next* virus season this fall. He has set the context so that we will do anything to keep from getting sick, keep from going into lockdown, keep from crashing our now fragile economy. When the next virus comes, the stage is set - by President Trump - for universal, trackable, verifiable, mandatory vaccination as outlined in my post above. This is not just another shot. This includes permanent inserted nano technology tied into this new 5G network that tracks our compliance and conditions individuals’ economic participation in society, via *cryptocurrency*, on vaccine compliance.

We have now been conditioned to do as we are told. If we do not comply, we are vectors of disease, murderers and the cause of economic hardship. Trump will call for universal vaccines and with it will lead us into new prosperity ... conditioned on getting the vaccine provided by Microsoft Vaccine Services - with continual updates over time. There is universal bi-partisan agreement that this is a good outcome.

Why is Trump “part of this”? He could have just ignored the Corona virus, like the Swedes. The virus would have come and gone. The economy would have remained strong. And we’d have another fake news sequence to talk about. I am really concerned about this vaccination technology and the universal tracking and compliance philosophy behind it (not to mention it’s abortifacient - the satanic sacramentals). And Trump has framed mandatory participation as the most likely outcome - heading into the fall.
Fred Martinez said…
Trump actually framed mandatory participation?
Aqua said…
There is no question he did that. The shutdown order came on March 16. He stood at the podium for six weeks with Pence, Fauci, Birx, Redfield (CDC), Adams (Surgeon General) etc and urged America to participate in his shutdown. My business essentially ended overnight because everyone we used to serve was now sheltering in place.

No question he “framed mandatory participation”, via emergency executive authority, and set that precedent for the nation and its Governors. The only question remaining, and it’s a big one, is what does that mean for the future - in order to plan accordingly.
Aqua said…
The alternative path - to NOT frame mandatory participation in future universal vaccine programs - would have been to defend constitutional rights and liberties as more important than external threats. Any suspension would have been framed as temporary with individual rights and liberties enshrined as the ultimate default.

Instead, he framed universal suspension for the collective good as appropriate, necessary - now and for any future similar emergency (defined at the Executive’s sole discretion).

With the balance of powers being removed so easily, we are left wide open to future events, especially if or when the leftists/communists win an election. The precedent has been set. He can do it. We accept that he can do it and will fully comply and force our neighbors who might disagree to comply with us.
Pisco30 said…
Aqua, Consider that Trump is taking advice from the criminal Fauci and other advisers. It would be politically disaster if he did what you suggest. Luciference Gates, CCP, WHO, all in cohorts, for what though? It's the eugenics mentality that the future will their blood lines? Egotism
7:51 AM

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My good friend ( now deceased ), Mother Teresa of the Still River Mass convent , called me years before the McLucas story broke.

https://akacatholic.com/cmtv-vs-sspx/ Latest Comments 2Vermont JULY 30, 2019 I think the only thing I would add here is what seems like MV’S obsession with things of a sexual nature. Tom A JULY 30, 2019 He, like many, defend the institution with the zeal that should be used to defend the Faith. Sad. What Mr. Voris fails to admit is that it is the institution of the conciliar fake church that is the biggest enemy of the Faith. Lynda JULY 30, 2019 Blinded by secular values and prestige of man. coastalfarm JULY 30, 2019 Please see the article “Unmarked building, quiet legal help for accused priests” Dryden, Mich. (AP) for the priest Mr. Voris defends, Rev.Eduard Perrone of Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church also known as Assumption Grotto, is co-founder of Opus Bono Sacerdotii. This non-profit organization takes in accused priests and gives them shelter, legal defense, transportation, etc. Opus Bono claims to have helped over 8,000 priests and has raised over $8 million 2002-201

Might Biden be a Liar & Predator like McCarrick?

September 15, 2020   Everyone knows that sexual predator ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick is a liar. His whole life was a lie of betrayal of the most sacred vows he took and the violation of the moral tenets of the Catholic faith which he desecrated. Most people don't realize that part of this desecration of lies included lying for "gravely sinful" Democrats like Joe Biden. McCarrick protected Biden when then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later to be Pope Benedict XVI) wrote that bishops were not to admit to Communion politicians like "gravely sinful" Biden who supports the killing of unborn babies. McCarrick lied for politicians like Biden by ignoring the important parts of the Ratzinger letter and told bishops not to ignore the Catholic Church law.  Last year, Fr. Robert Morey denied Holy Communion to the “gravely sinful” Biden following a "2004 decree signed jointly by the bishops of

The Biben Lying Machine: "Joe , do you know what else is a Sin besides Killing Babies? Lying... "

October 09, 2020   It appears that Joe Biden was even a lying machine in 2008 according to the post " Media Ignores Biden Repeatedly Lies During 'Meet the Press' Interview" on the Weasel Zippers website: Joe Biden Repeatedly Lies During "Meet the Press" Interview, Claims he Doesn't Support Taxpayer Funded Abortions.....   Joe, do you know what else is a sin besides killing babies? Lying... ... Joe Biden repeatedly made the claim in a Sunday interview on the NBC political show "Meet the Press" that he opposes taxpayer funding of abortions. However, a look at his voting record over the years reveals numerous instances where Barack Obama's pro-abortion running mate did exactly that. "I don't support public, public funding. I don't, because that flips the burden. That's then telling me I have to accept a different view," he said on the program. As recently as February, Biden voted against an amendmen