Pro-Abortion Terrorists Claim Responsibility for University Bombing
By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman
SANTIAGO,
April 26, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A terrorist group calling itself
the Insurrectionist Federation has reportedly taken credit for the
recent bombing of the University of the Andes in reprisal for a decision
of the Chilean Supreme Court prohibiting the distribution of the
abortifacient "morning after pill".
The bomb detonated in a
university bathroom on April 23. Although no one was hurt, ACI Prensa
reports that the bathroom suffered severe damage, contrary to media
reports that the device was just a "noise bomb".
"They say it's
just a 'noise bomb' but in reality the bathroom was destroyed and if
anyone had been there they would have been killed or injured," a
university source told ACI Prensa.
The report, which originated with Chile's Radio Cooperativa, was based on an email message sent to Chilean authorities.
"Credit
for the attack has been claimed in relation to the debate which has
existed in our society regarding methods of avoiding contraceptives,"
said Xavier Armendáriz, a federal prosecutor, in an interview with Radio
Cooperativa.
The Chilean Supreme Court struck down the
government's policy as unconstitutional, because it violates the right
to life guaranteed in the nation's charter document.
The attack
was carried out against the University of the Andes because one of the
court's judges has an affiliation with the institution, according to ACI
Prensa.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moscow Government Warns Homosexuals not to Organize "Gay" Demonstrations
By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman
MOSCOW,
April 26, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com)- The Moscow City government has made
it clear that it will not tolerate the public promotion of sodomy during
Labor Day celebrations on May 1st.
"The city authorities will
act decisively, just as they have in years past, to impede those
actions," said Serguéi Tsoy, a spokesman for Moscow's mayor, Yuri
Luzhkov.
"The absolute majority in society rejects those
demonstrations, as well as the gay lifestyle and philosophy," Luzhkov
added, and warned that if homosexuals took to the streets they could be
injured by attackers, according to Interfax.
"Homosexuals intend to create disharmony to obstruct a historic celebration and impose its norms and creed on society," he said.
Homosexual
groups organized illegal demonstrations in 2006 and 2007, which they
have used to create international pressure on Moscow to accede to their
political agenda. They have appealed the Moscow government's decision to
ban such marches to the European court in Strasbourg.
But
Luzhkov and the Moscow government haven't budged. Luzhkov seems to have a
particular devotion to opposing the promotion of sodomy. At a meeting
in 2006 with representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church, Luzhkov
reportedly called gay demonstrations "a satanic event".
[Truer words were never spoken. - Gary L. Morella]
Homosexual
organizer Nikolay Alexyev claims he will test the Moscow government's
resolve this year by organizing five marches a day during the entire
month of May.
The Catholic Monitor commenter Aqua had this to say to the Vox Cantoris website: Aqua said… Fred, your topic here reminds me of a dust-up, a few days ago, on Vox Cantoris. He asserted that it is our duty as Christians to wear masks to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass if the government tells us we must, or they will close our Churches. My response to him was that I find it inconceivable that an orthodox Catholic, such as himself, would ever submit to unjust dictates from secular government over how we approach Our Lord in Holy Mass. My response to him was that the Mass belongs to Catholics and we decide, within the bounds of Tradition, and in accord with the Word of Jesus, how we conduct ourselves in Holy Mass. Only one authority prevails over Mass and that is our God and the Sacred Tradition given by Him to guide us in all times and places. Understand, there is nothing inherently wrong with wearing a mask to Mass. But there is EVERYTHING wrong with wearing a symbol
Comments