Skip to main content

Why doesn't Church Militant's Voris call Opus Dei & Francis's Vatican Cult-like?

Church Militant has called SSPX Bishop Bernard Fellay a "big liar" who "needs to be expelled" for sex-abuse cover-up and has said that the Society of St. Puis X (SSPX) supporters are a "cult." [https://twitter.com/Michael_Voris/status/1293576524751409152] 

Why can't Church Militant call Francis a "big liar" who "needs to be expelled" and why doesn't Michael Voris call the Francis Vatican cult-like when it does cover-up of sex abuse?

Don't Voris and his collaborators really care about the victims and are they soft on pedo-protectors when it comes to Francis's Vatican cover-up victims?

Why are Francis conservatives so soft when it comes to pedo exposure and removal of Francis as well as his apparent cult-like Vatican?

I am waiting for Voris' Church Militant to do a months in the making investigation of Francis and his inner circle leadership's sex-abuse cover-ups. And I'm not talking about phony Church Militant puff pieces such as "Mother Alleges Sex Abuse Cover-Up Under Cdl. Bergoglio" that cover-up as much as they expose of Francis' "constant protection" of the clerical gay mafia in Argentina. [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/05/why-was-church-militant-apparently.html?m=1]

Why hasn't Church Militant send a reporter or even called the Argentinian Wanderer to expose Francis?

The Catholic Argentinian website the Wanderer on October 23, 2014 posted "Unmasking Bergoglio":

"Bergoglio always had the 'gay agenda' among his plans... It is a question of asking the Buenoairean clergy about the constant protection that he lavished on many homosexual priests."

Voris will gently and mildly say "abusive homosexual bishop like Zanchetta, Piñeda or Maccarone, or a predator priest like Grassi, Inzoli or Corradi... escape criticism from the Pope [Francis]," but never will he say Francis's Vatican leadership is cult-like and "needs to be expelled" if guilty:

"If you are an abusive homosexual bishop like Zanchetta, Piñeda or Maccarone, or a predator priest like Grassi, Inzoli or Corradi, might you feel betrayed if a fellow cleric whom you knew shared your homosexual orientation came out with a statement condemning those who engage in homosexual behavior? Why does a cardinal like Francesco Coccopalmerio, whom multiple sources confirm attended a "drug-fueled homosexual party" in the Vatican, escape criticism from the Pope, who personally made the apartment available to Coccopalmerio's secretary, Msgr. Luigi Capozzi?"

Moreover, I am waiting for Voris to do a months in the making investigation into Opus Dei (OD) which apparently supports the Francis Vatican's agenda.

Opus Dei investigator Randy Engel says:

"Voris promotes and defends Opus Dei."

Yes, I am aware of the Church Militant of Nice softball article that Voris did on OD which between compliments briefly went over some of its sex abuse scandals.

Voris knows Engel so he just has to call or email her and she can help him in his new months in the making investigation of his friends at big money Opus Dei.

I think if Opus Dei's leadership is guilty they "need... to be expelled."

Instead, Voris in a video titled "The Answer," reposted by Restore-DC-Catholicism, said:

"As far as I can see Opus Dei which means the work of God is if not the answer is at least the best that I can see.
(Church Militant, "The Answer," 4:44-4:52 which was posted on Restore-DC-Catholicism, "The "Answer" according to Real Catholic TV, March 25, 2010)

In the above post, Restore-DC-Catholicism said former members of Opus Dei "relay their stories of how they were subject to subtle thought reform and increasing mental control."

Why doesn't Michael Voris call  Opus Dei cult-like?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Former advisor to Sec. of Defense, Col. Douglas MacGregor: "the next phase of the Ukrainian War will not only destroy the Ukrainian state. It will also demolish the last vestiges of the postwar liberal order"

Macgregor appears to cite intel sources for his numbers and timetable—and I assume he really does have good sources. He says the offensive will happen “not sooner than 12/10 and not later than 12/19.” It will involve something like 540,000 troops with 1,500 tanks, thousands of other armored vehicles, huge numbers of helicopters, fixed wing aircraft, and bombers. These are numbers he says that have been confirmed by US intel. - Mark Wauck [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/doug-macgregors-timetable-and-scale?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=473679&post_id=89073832&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email] Modern Diplomacy reports that  "Douglas Macgregor , Col. (ret.), who was the former advisor to the Secretary of Defense in the Trump administration" says that  "the next phase of the Ukrainian War will not only destroy the Ukrainian state. It will also demolish the last vestiges of the postwar liberal order": The Biden administration repeated
Post a Comment
Read more

Mainstream Media: "Is America the Real Victim of Anti-Russia Sanctions?" & "Biden's arrogant anti-Russian sanctions have amounted to a price hike on working class Americans that have so far failed to weaken the Russian economy"

  Mainstream Media Acknowledges Biden’s “Arrogant” Sanctions On Russia Are Damning Americans:     @MaxBlumenthal Biden's arrogant anti-Russian sanctions have amounted to a price hike on working class Americans that have so far failed to weaken the Russian economy. His neocon policy accelerates the process of de-dollarization, diplomatic isolation & imperial decline. The mainstream new outlet asked "Is America the Real Victim of Anti-Russia Sanctions?": Remember the claims that Russia’s economy was more or less irrelevant, merely the equivalent of a small, not very impressive European country? “Putin, who has an economy the size of Italy,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in 2014 after the invasion of Crimea, “[is] playing a poker game with a pair of twos and winning.” Of increasing Russian diplomatic and geopolitical influence in Europe, the Middle East, and East Asia, The Economist asked in 2019, “How did a country with an economy the size of Spain … ach
Post a Comment
Read more