Skip to main content

Are Michael Savage, Skojec & Alex Jones the Controlled Opposition?

As more Catholics are starting to realize that the coronavirus hysteria is as Catholic lawyer and journalist Chris Ferrera said a "monumental fraud," it appears that One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec wished to continue the fraud by hitching his wagon and crumbing credibility to pro-abortion eugenicist Michael Savage.
(Michael Savage.com, "Savage: No Easy Choice in Abortion Debate" & Mere Orthodoxy, "A lesson in Discernment: Michael Savage and Mandated Birth Control," October 9, 2010)

On April 17, in his "Coronavirus Update" One Peter Five podcast he linked to the leftist New York Times (at the Chicago Tribune website) and an article by the pro-abortion newspaper that lionized the so-called conservative radio host.

In the Skojec link, the leftist newspaper admiringly wrote that the fake conservative Savage whom it claimed was a "conservative media star" despicably called the real conservative pro-life Rush Limbaugh as well as others pro-life conservatives "intellectual dwarfs" and even "mock[ed]" him as "Rush Limbaugh,M.D., Ph.D."
(ChicagoTribune.com, The New York Times, "Why Michael Savage is blasting Sean Hannity and the ring-wing media on the coronavirus," by Jeremy Peters, April 16, 2020)

The article reported that his wife Janet Weiner (Savage's real last name is Weiner) in an interview shamefully also attacked Limbaugh and other conservatives saying they have the "culty hero worship of the uneducated" and "I don't want to identify with the conservative movement anymore."

It appears that the pro-abortion eugenicist  Savage and his wife like Hillary Clinton are calling the millions of listeners of Rush and other pro-life conservatives the "deplorables."

The New York Times piece portrayed the pro-abortion Savage as being another Albert Einstein because he has a Ph.D. in "nutritional ethnomedicine" from leftist Berkeley University.

The new Einstein Savage was apparently the first "media star" to start the harebrained conspiracy theory that "65 million" were going to die due to the coronavirus.

On January 24, he started the panic hysteria by claiming that "65 million [will be] wiped out" by the new virus in a Savage Nation podcast.
(The Savage Nation Podcast, "Deadly coronavirus outbreak quickly spreading," January 24, 2020, 10:45)

On January 24, in The Alex Jones Show, space alien believer Mike Adams told Jones that Bill Gates' model show "65 million deaths will occur globally from a very similar strain of the coronavirus."
(The Alex Jones Show, "Learn the Secrets of the Coronavirus Outbreak Who's Behind it," January 24, 2020 1:20:57-1:21:02)

It appears the three Einsteins: Savage, Adams and Jones were all reading from the same conspiracy theory script.

On February 9, Skojec was one of the first Catholic "media stars" to promote the panic hysteria by posting a link in Twitter to a coronavirus scare video of Alex Jones' InfoWars protege Paul Joseph Watson.

Is it possible that the panic promotion could have been a coordinated and synchronized media effort begun by the apparent controlled opposition "conservatives": Savage, Adams, Jones and Skojec?

Is it a coincidence that Savage and Adams on Jones' show stated on the exact same day that "65 million" could die from the coronavirus?

Is it also a coincidence that Skojec only two weeks after Savage, Adams and Jones began the promotion of the virus hysteria started promoting Jones' InfoWars protege's virus scare video?

Moreover, is it a coincidence that just two days ago that Skojec is still promoting the pro-abortion eugenicist Savage who together with Adams and Jones let loose the first virus panic trial balloons which soon became the hysteria that led to the unconstitutional totalitarian lockdowns and banning of the Mass?

In the last few days, the four appear to be backtracking a little while still not disclaiming their harebrained conspiracy theory that "65 million" people will die from the supposed new Black Plague Coronavirus.

Skojec has never personally promoted that "65 million" will die from the virus, but he obviously is in league with the three in propagandizing that the coronavirus is supposedly a new Black Plague.

All the above could be coincidental or is it conceivable that Savage who suddenly is being lionized by the leftist New York Times, a few days ago, as a Einstein with the other three are part of a possible controlled opposition.

Remember that Vladimir Lenin said:

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
(Urban Dictionary, "Controlled Opposition")

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainstream Media: "Is America the Real Victim of Anti-Russia Sanctions?" & "Biden's arrogant anti-Russian sanctions have amounted to a price hike on working class Americans that have so far failed to weaken the Russian economy"

  Mainstream Media Acknowledges Biden’s “Arrogant” Sanctions On Russia Are Damning Americans:     @MaxBlumenthal Biden's arrogant anti-Russian sanctions have amounted to a price hike on working class Americans that have so far failed to weaken the Russian economy. His neocon policy accelerates the process of de-dollarization, diplomatic isolation & imperial decline. The mainstream new outlet asked "Is America the Real Victim of Anti-Russia Sanctions?": Remember the claims that Russia’s economy was more or less irrelevant, merely the equivalent of a small, not very impressive European country? “Putin, who has an economy the size of Italy,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in 2014 after the invasion of Crimea, “[is] playing a poker game with a pair of twos and winning.” Of increasing Russian diplomatic and geopolitical influence in Europe, the Middle East, and East Asia, The Economist asked in 2019, “How did a country with an economy the size of Spain … ach

Book Review: The Banished Heart: Origins of Heteropraxis in the Catholic Church by Dr. Geoffrey Hull (minor update)

http://theradtrad.blogspot.com/2013/08/book-review-banished-heart-origins-of.html Book Review: The Banished Heart: Origins of Heteropraxis in the Catholic Church by Dr. Geoffrey Hull (minor update) Dr Geoffrey Hull source: Wikipedia.org Once every now and then one finds an author capable of approaching a daunting subject with remarkable clairvoyance, not muddling himself among polemics or minutiae. Dr. Geoffrey Hull is one such author. His  The Banished Heart: Origins of Heteropraxis in the Catholic Church  recalls that old saying that the truth is not between two positions, but rather above them. Hull examines the roots of the twentieth century liturgical overhaul by rising above the disputes between liberals and traditionalists that have raged on for five decades and taking a long, far-sighted look back centuries more, to the late first millennium, when the Roman liturgy was maturing, the Roman patriarchate was expanding its missionary presence in Western and Eastern Europe, and the