Skip to main content

Allegations and rumors: "Sr Pascalina Lehnert (below) who was Pope Pius XII's housekeeper and secretary and faced rumours, apparently untrue, that she was his mistress. When Pius's ill-health declined dramatically in the mid 1950s Pascalina in effect isolated him from all but the most senior church figures, and was accused of taking key decisions in his name without consulting him, hence her nickname as the she-pope. She and Montini, who had been close to Pius, clashed strongly. His supporters believed she manipulated the failing pope into moving Montini out of Rome"



https://politics.ie/threads/allegations-involving-mcquaid.177243/page-13 

The she-pope, also called La Popessa or La Papessa, was a The she-pope, also called La Popessa or La Papessa, was a Bavarian nun by the name of Sr Pascalina Lehnert (below) who was Pope Pius XII's housekeeper and secretary and faced rumours, apparently untrue, that she was his mistress. When Pius's ill-health declined dramatically in the mid 1950s Pascalina in effect isolated him from all but the most senior church figures, and was accused of taking key decisions in his name without consulting him, hence her nickname as the she-pope. She and Montini, who had been close to Pius, clashed strongly. His supporters believed she manipulated the failing pope into moving Montini out of Rome, and denied him the red hat, which was presumed to be automatic and would go with being Archbishop of Milan.)


Pascalina became a hate figure in the Vatican, and among the pope's family who desperately tried to get her sacked. She had basically latched onto him when he was nuncio in Munich (image below) and she was a nun there. She ensured, or he ensured, that she was brought with him to every other posting, including being pope. By the 1930s there were widespread rumours that she was his mistress. He (then known as Cardinal Pacelli) asked Pope Pius XI to order an investigation to clear him of the rumours. The investigation duly did.

But the rumours persisted as to what hold Pascalina had over Pacelli - whether it was just a close friendship or whether they were lovers. By the 1950s she was such a powerful figure in the Vatican that even Pacelli's family could not get him to see sense and dismiss her, and he did whatever she asked, including exiling Montini and denying him the red hat. To give an idea of the significance of that - Montini was widely seen as papabile: in other words, as a likely candidate for pope. All he needed to be in the race was red hat. But that was denied to him. (Even then, some of his supporters cast votes for him, as a mere archbishop, in the 1958 conclave.), which was presumed to be automatic and would go with being Archbishop of Milan.)

Pascalina became a hate figure in the Vatican, and among the pope's family who desperately tried to get her sacked. She had basically latched onto him when he was nuncio in Munich (image below) and she was a nun there. She ensured, or he ensured, that she was brought with him to every other posting, including being pope. By the 1930s there were widespread rumours that she was his mistress. He (then known as Cardinal Pacelli) asked Pope Pius XI to order an investigation to clear him of the rumours. The investigation duly did.

But the rumours persisted as to what hold Pascalina had over Pacelli - whether it was just a close friendship or whether they were lovers. By the 1950s she was such a powerful figure in the Vatican that even Pacelli's family could not get him to see sense and dismiss her, and he did whatever she asked, including exiling Montini and denying him the red hat. To give an idea of the significance of that - Montini was widely seen as papabile: in other words, as a likely candidate for pope. All he needed to be in the race was red hat. But that was denied to him. (Even then, some of his supporters cast votes for him, as a mere archbishop, in the 1958 conclave.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vox Cantoris vs. Aqua

The Catholic Monitor commenter Aqua had this to say to the Vox Cantoris website: Aqua said… Fred, your topic here reminds me of a dust-up, a few days ago, on Vox Cantoris. He asserted that it is our duty as Christians to wear masks to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass if the government tells us we must, or they will close our Churches. My response to him was that I find it inconceivable that an orthodox Catholic, such as himself, would ever submit to unjust dictates from secular government over how we approach Our Lord in Holy Mass. My response to him was that the Mass belongs to Catholics and we decide, within the bounds of Tradition, and in accord with the Word of Jesus, how we conduct ourselves in Holy Mass. Only one authority prevails over Mass and that is our God and the Sacred Tradition given by Him to guide us in all times and places. Understand, there is nothing inherently wrong with wearing a mask to Mass. But there is EVERYTHING wrong with wearing a symbol...

Might Biden be a Liar & Predator like McCarrick?

September 15, 2020   Everyone knows that sexual predator ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick is a liar. His whole life was a lie of betrayal of the most sacred vows he took and the violation of the moral tenets of the Catholic faith which he desecrated. Most people don't realize that part of this desecration of lies included lying for "gravely sinful" Democrats like Joe Biden. McCarrick protected Biden when then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later to be Pope Benedict XVI) wrote that bishops were not to admit to Communion politicians like "gravely sinful" Biden who supports the killing of unborn babies. McCarrick lied for politicians like Biden by ignoring the important parts of the Ratzinger letter and told bishops not to ignore the Catholic Church law.  Last year, Fr. Robert Morey denied Holy Communion to the “gravely sinful” Biden following a "2004 decree signed jointly by the bishops of ...