Skip to main content

Historian Pidal: I am fortunate enough not to have initially confronted Las Casas alone, but rather in comparison with other contemporaries; I didn't suffer the fascinating charm of the praising siren, because my ears were plugged with the careful reasoning of Fray Francisco de Vitoria and the soldierly tales of Bernal Díaz del Castillo; then Las Casas, next to the great theologians, shrinks extraordinarily, and next to the honorable conquistadors, he oozes bitter hatred and false exaggeration.

El padre Las Casas, su doble personalidad

https://ia902805.us.archive.org/8/items/elpadrelascasass00mene/elpadrelascasass00mene.pdf

But let us note that the defect of credulity implies other, lesser ones. Absolute reliance on the author's narrative leads one to believe that consulting other sources is unnecessary or to making poor use of them. I am referring primarily to Las Casas's other writings that do not contain autobiographical information. The Life of Las Casas by Fabié, for example, provides extensive information on several of Las Casas's writings, but does not examine them to highlight what Las Casas specifically advocated regarding Spanish rule in America, the rights of Indian lords and peoples, Spain's mortal sin, etc. A biography of Las Casas must always bear this doctrine in mind; it must, above all, inform oneself about what Las Casas fundamentally thought about the key issues that motivated his actions, in order to see how he acted accordingly. No biographer provides this information in a general sense; And so strange cases arise, such as the attribution to Las Casas (because he so indicates) of Cardinal Cisneros's reform plan, which is radically opposed to Las Casas's fundamental ideas, or the belief (because he claims so) that he pacified the rebel chieftain Enriquillo, a pacification achieved in a manner contrary to the entire ideology of Fray Bartolomé...

This lack of perspective we notice results in credulous biographies presenting Las Casas as an isolated figure, as he always presents himself, standing out among his contemporaries, who were deformedly diminished by him. I am fortunate enough not to have initially confronted Las Casas alone, but rather in comparison with other contemporaries; I didn't suffer the fascinating charm of the praising siren, because my ears were plugged with the careful reasoning of Fray Francisco de Vitoria and the soldierly tales of Bernal Díaz del Castillo; then Las Casas, next to the great theologians, shrinks extraordinarily, and next to the honorable conquistadors, he oozes bitter hatred and false exaggeration.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Might Biden be a Liar & Predator like McCarrick?

September 15, 2020   Everyone knows that sexual predator ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick is a liar. His whole life was a lie of betrayal of the most sacred vows he took and the violation of the moral tenets of the Catholic faith which he desecrated. Most people don't realize that part of this desecration of lies included lying for "gravely sinful" Democrats like Joe Biden. McCarrick protected Biden when then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later to be Pope Benedict XVI) wrote that bishops were not to admit to Communion politicians like "gravely sinful" Biden who supports the killing of unborn babies. McCarrick lied for politicians like Biden by ignoring the important parts of the Ratzinger letter and told bishops not to ignore the Catholic Church law.  Last year, Fr. Robert Morey denied Holy Communion to the “gravely sinful” Biden following a "2004 decree signed jointly by the bishops of ...

The Biben Lying Machine: "Joe , do you know what else is a Sin besides Killing Babies? Lying... "

October 09, 2020   It appears that Joe Biden was even a lying machine in 2008 according to the post " Media Ignores Biden Repeatedly Lies During 'Meet the Press' Interview" on the Weasel Zippers website: Joe Biden Repeatedly Lies During "Meet the Press" Interview, Claims he Doesn't Support Taxpayer Funded Abortions.....   Joe, do you know what else is a sin besides killing babies? Lying... ... Joe Biden repeatedly made the claim in a Sunday interview on the NBC political show "Meet the Press" that he opposes taxpayer funding of abortions. However, a look at his voting record over the years reveals numerous instances where Barack Obama's pro-abortion running mate did exactly that. "I don't support public, public funding. I don't, because that flips the burden. That's then telling me I have to accept a different view," he said on the program. As recently as February, Biden voted against an amendmen...

Vox Cantoris vs. Aqua

The Catholic Monitor commenter Aqua had this to say to the Vox Cantoris website: Aqua said… Fred, your topic here reminds me of a dust-up, a few days ago, on Vox Cantoris. He asserted that it is our duty as Christians to wear masks to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass if the government tells us we must, or they will close our Churches. My response to him was that I find it inconceivable that an orthodox Catholic, such as himself, would ever submit to unjust dictates from secular government over how we approach Our Lord in Holy Mass. My response to him was that the Mass belongs to Catholics and we decide, within the bounds of Tradition, and in accord with the Word of Jesus, how we conduct ourselves in Holy Mass. Only one authority prevails over Mass and that is our God and the Sacred Tradition given by Him to guide us in all times and places. Understand, there is nothing inherently wrong with wearing a mask to Mass. But there is EVERYTHING wrong with wearing a symbol...