Skip to main content

The Role of Deduction: Weaver favored deduction, a reasoning process that starts with general principles and derives specific conclusions. He believed that a commitment to transcendent truths (like those found in classical and Christian philosophy) provided the necessary grounding for sound deductive reasoning. Without these transcendent principles, deduction becomes arbitrary and potentially leads to harmful consequences, according to Weaver. 3. The Problem with Induction: Weaver was wary of induction, which moves from specific observations to general conclusions. He argued that excessive reliance on induction, without a firm foundation in transcendent principles, could lead to relativism and skepticism. He feared a loss of shared values and a weakening of the social order if induction becomes the dominant mode of reasoning. 4. The Loss of the Transcendent: Weaver's central concern was the "loss of the transcendent," which he saw as a rejection of objective, universal truths and values. He believed that this loss resulted in a weakened sense of meaning, purpose, and moral obligation. Without belief in the transcendent, individuals become more susceptible to fleeting trends and ideologies, and societies lose their grounding, according to Weaver.

AI Overview

AI Overview
Richard Weaver, a prominent conservative thinker, argued that the decline of Western civilization stemmed from a loss of belief in transcendent truths and a shift towards nominalism, which undermines the connection between language and objective reality
. 
Here's a breakdown of Weaver's ideas regarding deduction, induction, and the loss of the transcendent:
1. Weaver's Critique of Nominalism:
  • Weaver believed that Western decline began with the rise of nominalism, a philosophical stance that denies the existence of universal or abstract entities.
  • Nominalism, according to Weaver, weakens our ability to reason and make sound moral judgments because it separates words from the realities they should represent.
  • He saw William of Ockham as a key figure in the move towards nominalism. 
2. The Role of Deduction:
  • Weaver favored deduction, a reasoning process that starts with general principles and derives specific conclusions.
  • He believed that a commitment to transcendent truths (like those found in classical and Christian philosophy) provided the necessary grounding for sound deductive reasoning.
  • Without these transcendent principles, deduction becomes arbitrary and potentially leads to harmful consequences, according to Weaver. 
3. The Problem with Induction:
  • Weaver was wary of induction, which moves from specific observations to general conclusions.
  • He argued that excessive reliance on induction, without a firm foundation in transcendent principles, could lead to relativism and skepticism.
  • He feared a loss of shared values and a weakening of the social order if induction becomes the dominant mode of reasoning. 
4. The Loss of the Transcendent:
  • Weaver's central concern was the "loss of the transcendent," which he saw as a rejection of objective, universal truths and values.
  • He believed that this loss resulted in a weakened sense of meaning, purpose, and moral obligation.
  • Without belief in the transcendent, individuals become more susceptible to fleeting trends and ideologies, and societies lose their grounding, according to Weaver. 
In Summary:
Weaver argued that the Western world's embrace of nominalism and a prioritization of inductive reasoning over deductive reasoning grounded in transcendent truths led to a decline in Western civilization. He believed that a renewal of faith in transcendent values was essential to restoring intellectual and moral order. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vox Cantoris vs. Aqua

The Catholic Monitor commenter Aqua had this to say to the Vox Cantoris website: Aqua said… Fred, your topic here reminds me of a dust-up, a few days ago, on Vox Cantoris. He asserted that it is our duty as Christians to wear masks to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass if the government tells us we must, or they will close our Churches. My response to him was that I find it inconceivable that an orthodox Catholic, such as himself, would ever submit to unjust dictates from secular government over how we approach Our Lord in Holy Mass. My response to him was that the Mass belongs to Catholics and we decide, within the bounds of Tradition, and in accord with the Word of Jesus, how we conduct ourselves in Holy Mass. Only one authority prevails over Mass and that is our God and the Sacred Tradition given by Him to guide us in all times and places. Understand, there is nothing inherently wrong with wearing a mask to Mass. But there is EVERYTHING wrong with wearing a symbol...

Might Biden be a Liar & Predator like McCarrick?

September 15, 2020   Everyone knows that sexual predator ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick is a liar. His whole life was a lie of betrayal of the most sacred vows he took and the violation of the moral tenets of the Catholic faith which he desecrated. Most people don't realize that part of this desecration of lies included lying for "gravely sinful" Democrats like Joe Biden. McCarrick protected Biden when then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later to be Pope Benedict XVI) wrote that bishops were not to admit to Communion politicians like "gravely sinful" Biden who supports the killing of unborn babies. McCarrick lied for politicians like Biden by ignoring the important parts of the Ratzinger letter and told bishops not to ignore the Catholic Church law.  Last year, Fr. Robert Morey denied Holy Communion to the “gravely sinful” Biden following a "2004 decree signed jointly by the bishops of ...