Skip to main content

Villey's View on Rights: Villey did not completely dismiss the idea of rights but understood them differently. He emphasized objective "iura" [Justice] determined in relation to others and the social order, rather than subjective rights inherent to the individual. He saw the modern concept of subjective rights as a product of nominalist philosophy and individualism, a departure from the classical tradition.

AI Overview
Michel Villey, a prominent French legal philosopher, critiqued the modern concept of "human rights" arguing they are often deduced from an abstract and unrealistic notion of "man"
. 
Here's a breakdown of Villey's perspective:
1. Critique of Deductive Approach:
  • Villey questioned the prevailing approach of deducing "rights" from a pre-conceived idea of what "man" is, particularly when this idea is abstract and detached from social and historical contexts.
  • He believed this approach, characteristic of modern natural rights theories, led to the proclamation of unrealistic and unenforceable "rights". 
2. Importance of "Classical Natural Law":
  • Villey advocated for a return to the "classical natural law" tradition, rooted in the philosophy of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas.
  • In this tradition, "law" (ius) is not derived from abstract notions of "man" but from observing the natural order of things and determining what is "just" in concrete situations.
  • The role of the jurist is to discern what is "just" (the "ipsa res iusta"), not to invent or proclaim subjective rights. 
3. Villey's View on Rights:
  • Villey did not completely dismiss the idea of rights but understood them differently. He emphasized objective "iura" determined in relation to others and the social order, rather than subjective rights inherent to the individual.
  • He saw the modern concept of subjective rights as a product of nominalist philosophy and individualism, a departure from the classical tradition. 
In essence, Villey believed that a sound legal and philosophical approach to "rights" should:
  • Be grounded in a realistic understanding of human nature within its social and historical context.
  • Focus on discerning what is "just" in concrete situations rather than deducing rights from abstract principles.
  • Consider the objective "iura" that arise from social relationships and the common good, rather than proclaiming a multitude of subjective rights. 
Note: Villey's critique remains a significant contribution to the debate surrounding human rights, although his views are not universally accepted. 
  • The essence of law according to Michel Villey
    May 4, 2021 — Villey does not deny the role of the laws in the discovery of the juridical domain. In his view, juridical norms are subsidiary for the jurist. Villey's legal-p...
    Forum. Supplement to Acta Philosophica
  • Michel Villey's Critique on Human Rights - SpringerLink
    Sep 23, 2023 — After his death, his name was given to the most important Centre for legal philosophy in France, the Institut Michel-Villey pour la culture juridique et la phil...
    SpringerLink
  • Michel Villey (Chapter 27) - Great Christian Jurists in French ...
    Summary. The greatest exponent of French philosophy of law in the later twentieth century, Michel Villey's methodological and substantial references were Aristo...
    Cambridge University Press & Assessment
Show all
AI responses may include mistakes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vox Cantoris vs. Aqua

The Catholic Monitor commenter Aqua had this to say to the Vox Cantoris website: Aqua said… Fred, your topic here reminds me of a dust-up, a few days ago, on Vox Cantoris. He asserted that it is our duty as Christians to wear masks to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass if the government tells us we must, or they will close our Churches. My response to him was that I find it inconceivable that an orthodox Catholic, such as himself, would ever submit to unjust dictates from secular government over how we approach Our Lord in Holy Mass. My response to him was that the Mass belongs to Catholics and we decide, within the bounds of Tradition, and in accord with the Word of Jesus, how we conduct ourselves in Holy Mass. Only one authority prevails over Mass and that is our God and the Sacred Tradition given by Him to guide us in all times and places. Understand, there is nothing inherently wrong with wearing a mask to Mass. But there is EVERYTHING wrong with wearing a symbol...

Might Biden be a Liar & Predator like McCarrick?

September 15, 2020   Everyone knows that sexual predator ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick is a liar. His whole life was a lie of betrayal of the most sacred vows he took and the violation of the moral tenets of the Catholic faith which he desecrated. Most people don't realize that part of this desecration of lies included lying for "gravely sinful" Democrats like Joe Biden. McCarrick protected Biden when then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later to be Pope Benedict XVI) wrote that bishops were not to admit to Communion politicians like "gravely sinful" Biden who supports the killing of unborn babies. McCarrick lied for politicians like Biden by ignoring the important parts of the Ratzinger letter and told bishops not to ignore the Catholic Church law.  Last year, Fr. Robert Morey denied Holy Communion to the “gravely sinful” Biden following a "2004 decree signed jointly by the bishops of ...