Skip to main content

Is the ACLU Crazy, Evil … or Both?

---- Original Message -----
From: Americans For Truth

Is the ACLU Crazy, Evil … or Both?

(Click HERE for larger picture) ACLU's homosexual Executive Director, Anthony Romero. Read the ACLU's outrageous, pro-bathroom-sex legal brief here:
Folks, could any of us on the Right make up something this nutty, this extreme? The ACLU is defending DEVIANT SEX IN PUBLIC BATHROOMS as a "privacy right." This was too much even for lefty MSNBC "Countdown" host Keith Olbermann, who makes a living slamming conservatives. Here's a paragraph from the ACLU's unbelievable Larry Craig brief (emphasis added):
Sex is a constitutionally protected liberty interest. ... Thus, the government may make sex a crime only where it has a constitutionally sufficient justification for doing so. ... [cites the Supreme Court's 2003 Lawrence v. Texas decision striking down Texas' sodomy law]. The government does not have a constitutionally sufficient justification for making private sex a crime. ... It follows that an invitation to have private sex is constitutionally protected and may not be made a crime. ... This is so even where the proposition occurs in a public place, whether in a bar or in a restroom.
Activists courts are the tool that the Left has used to advance what pro-family attorney Jan LaRue calls America's "unholy trinity": abortion-on-demand, pornography, and homosexuality. If killing one's unborn child (with his or her own, separate DNA) can be justified as a "privacy" right; if owning or buying even child pornography can be defended as a First Amendment "right," then hey, why not homosexual perversion in bathroom stalls?
We know enough about the ACLU to assert that even if a homosexual activist (Anthony Romero, above) were not running the organization, it would have joined this case. "Sexual freedom" is the Libertine Left's new clarion call to legalize and expand the "rights" of even the most outlandish perversions: sadomasochistic house parties; the hetero "swingers community"; the "right" of sex businesses to set up shop in your neighborhood; "polyamory" (multiple-partner "marriage," anyone?); and, yes, even public bathroom sex.
Wackiness aside, if America's modern history has taught us anything, it is to take the Left's legal gambits and cultural aggression seriously. Using the courts, the ACLU lawyers and their comrades in the Homosexual, Radical Feminist (Abortion) and Porn Lobbies are destroying America, in the name of freedom.
Think about that later this year when you vote for our next U.S. President, who will pick the nation's our highest-level judges. God help us.
-- Peter LaBarbera,
P.S. Here's a great piece on the ACLU's folly by Brenda Zurita of CWA's ( Beverly LaHaye Institute:
Sex in Bathroom Stalls, Privacy Expectations and the ACLU
And the Punch Line Is …

Will the ACLU’s bathroom-sex agenda stall?

By Brenda Zurita

Reprinted with permission from CWA’s Beverly LaHaye Institute, Jan. 16, 2008

Due to the current Hollywood writer’s strike, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has jumped in to fill the gap existing in late-night monologues and sit-coms. If only that were true there might be a joke in there somewhere.

Alas, the title refers to a brief filed by the ACLU in the Larry Craig case in Minnesota. Yes, the senator of the “wide stance” fame has a new defense argument, courtesy of the ACLU.

The Associated Press reported that the ACLU is arguing there is an expectation of privacy when people have sex in public bathrooms.

Hmmm, when I enter a public bathroom I have the expectation of toilet paper being in the stall, not a sex encounter. And privacy in a public bathroom is at a minimum. The gap around the door frame and the open space between the dividers and the floor and ceiling provide only a modicum of coverage. Not exactly a rendezvous spot for randy patrons expecting privacy. It does however make an excellent place for exhibitionists to meet.

Imagine taking your child to a public restroom and hearing two people engaging in a sex act six inches away. Again, due to the construction of the average public restroom stall, there is little that is private. Having an expectation of privacy there is laughable. And what about the expectation of people using the restroom for what is was intended and not being subjected to sex acts?

But let’s just say the ACLU is correct and the expectation of privacy for having sex in a public bathroom is tenable. The next time a “wide stancer” needs to stretch his legs, should he do so in the Minnesota Supreme Court’s restrooms? Public school restroom stalls? Public library restroom stalls? Community center restroom stalls? Government building restroom stalls? (This is not to be confused with Congressional offices, the Oval Office or some of the national monuments in Washington, all of which may or may not have stories to tell from their public restroom perspective but do have a few vignettes about sexcapades outside their stall walls.)

If we throw morals, decency and common sense out the window with this argument of expectation of privacy in a public restroom while engaging in sex, what are the implications?

Given the law passed in Maryland allowing men to use women’s restrooms if they consider themselves a woman trapped in a man’s body and allowing women to use men’s restrooms if they consider themselves a man trapped in a woman’s body, what is to stop a rapist or pedophile from entering a restroom and abusing a boy or girl in a restroom stall? Would a man have to claim he is a woman in a man’s body to use the women’s room and if so, what is the proof he’s not just a wily rapist or pedophile? And who will be monitoring this? If there is an expectation of privacy then all users of public restrooms would have to assume the sex going on in the next stall is consensual and cannot be reported as it would invade their privacy. Where are the lines drawn?

The subject of bathroom breaks seems to have broken from reality. As moms everywhere will tell you, make sure you go before you leave home because if the ACLU is successful, you won’t want to know what is going on in the stall next to you.


Recent & Relevant Posts on AFTAH Website:

Barber on MRSA: Pro-Homosexual Elites Are Endangering Children and Society
HIV/AIDS: Anybody Can Get It? (Highly recommended!)
Love Letter from Canada: AFTAH = Nazis
Florida Marriage Amendment in Danger of Not Making 2008 Ballot
Homosexual Letter on Folsom: ‘Get these Numbskulls to Keep their Damned Clothes on’
Big City Homosexual Men Are Epicenter of New Virulent MRSA Staph Strain
Have Universities Become the Enemy of a Free Society?
Joe Dallas Critiques ‘The Gay Gospel’
C-SPAN Airs Speech by Homosexual Bishop Vicky Gene Robinson — on Christmas Eve
Revealing Quotes by Advocates of Homosexuality ("gay" monogamy includes outside sex ... )
The ‘Gay’ Press: Where ‘AIDS Prevention’ and Promiscuity Promotion Co-Exist
Drug-Heavy Gay ‘Circuit Parties’ as HIV/AIDS Fundraisers? The White Party in Miami

Will You Help AFTAH Stand For Truth?
The ACLU is well-funded as it crusades for evil and bizarre causes like the "right" to have deviant sex in a bathroom stall (!). Would you help us defend decency and your religious liberties by regularly praying for and financially supporting Americans For Truth? To make a donation online to Americans For Truth, click on our new-and-improved online donation page (you can use PayPal or your own credit card):

We are grateful for those of you who have signed

up as monthly "Truth Team" givers by pledging a donation on of at least $20/month to AFTAH. We think this is a good investment in your children's and their children's future!
Our goal is to sign up 1,000 monthly AFTAH 'Truth Team' givers to put us on healthy financial footing.

You can also send your tax-deductible donation via regular mail to:

Americans For Truth, P.O. Box 5522, Naperville, IL 60567-5522


Have you ever seen the testimony of a former homosexual?

AFTAH Banquet Videos Now Available!
Excellent teaching tool for young people who are being brainwashed on today's counterfeit 'tolerance'!

The AFTAH Banquet Videos are finally available and will be shipped ASAP! To order a complete DVD (or CD) set of both ex-lesbian Charlene Cothran’s and parental rights hero David Parker’s outstanding talks, make an online donation of at least $25 postpaid to Americans For Truth ( Please use the online form at to specify your order. You can substitute an audio CD but you must request this specifically. To order by regular mail, send your check or money order specifying “2007 Banquet DVD” (or CD) to: Americans For Truth, P.O. Box 5522, Naperville, IL 60567-5522.

Bulk Orders available: 2 for $40; 3 for $55; 4 for $70; add $10 for each additional DVD or contact us at (or 630-717-7631) for large bulk order pricing.


To make a tax-deductible donation to AFTAH using your credit card or PayPal, go to:

To subscribe to Americans For Truth emails, click

To make a tax-deductible donation to Americans For Truth:

To become an AFTAH Truth Team member (donating at least $20/mo.), go to

To sign up for our Feedblitz service to receive notice of all AFTAH web postings, click

Send your tax-deductible donation via regular mail to: Americans For Truth, P.O. Box 5522, Naperville, IL 60567-5522. Thank you!



Popular posts from this blog

Might Biden be a Liar & Predator like McCarrick?

September 15, 2020   Everyone knows that sexual predator ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick is a liar. His whole life was a lie of betrayal of the most sacred vows he took and the violation of the moral tenets of the Catholic faith which he desecrated. Most people don't realize that part of this desecration of lies included lying for "gravely sinful" Democrats like Joe Biden. McCarrick protected Biden when then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later to be Pope Benedict XVI) wrote that bishops were not to admit to Communion politicians like "gravely sinful" Biden who supports the killing of unborn babies. McCarrick lied for politicians like Biden by ignoring the important parts of the Ratzinger letter and told bishops not to ignore the Catholic Church law.  Last year, Fr. Robert Morey denied Holy Communion to the “gravely sinful” Biden following a "2004 decree signed jointly by the bishops of

My good friend ( now deceased ), Mother Teresa of the Still River Mass convent , called me years before the McLucas story broke. Latest Comments 2Vermont JULY 30, 2019 I think the only thing I would add here is what seems like MV’S obsession with things of a sexual nature. Tom A JULY 30, 2019 He, like many, defend the institution with the zeal that should be used to defend the Faith. Sad. What Mr. Voris fails to admit is that it is the institution of the conciliar fake church that is the biggest enemy of the Faith. Lynda JULY 30, 2019 Blinded by secular values and prestige of man. coastalfarm JULY 30, 2019 Please see the article “Unmarked building, quiet legal help for accused priests” Dryden, Mich. (AP) for the priest Mr. Voris defends, Rev.Eduard Perrone of Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church also known as Assumption Grotto, is co-founder of Opus Bono Sacerdotii. This non-profit organization takes in accused priests and gives them shelter, legal defense, transportation, etc. Opus Bono claims to have helped over 8,000 priests and has raised over $8 million 2002-201

The Biben Lying Machine: "Joe , do you know what else is a Sin besides Killing Babies? Lying... "

October 09, 2020   It appears that Joe Biden was even a lying machine in 2008 according to the post " Media Ignores Biden Repeatedly Lies During 'Meet the Press' Interview" on the Weasel Zippers website: Joe Biden Repeatedly Lies During "Meet the Press" Interview, Claims he Doesn't Support Taxpayer Funded Abortions.....   Joe, do you know what else is a sin besides killing babies? Lying... ... Joe Biden repeatedly made the claim in a Sunday interview on the NBC political show "Meet the Press" that he opposes taxpayer funding of abortions. However, a look at his voting record over the years reveals numerous instances where Barack Obama's pro-abortion running mate did exactly that. "I don't support public, public funding. I don't, because that flips the burden. That's then telling me I have to accept a different view," he said on the program. As recently as February, Biden voted against an amendmen