The apparently anti-SSPX Canon Law Made Easy site need answer the following questions:
Do
the teachings of Aquinas on "necessity knows no law” or "case of
necessity" apply to "the entire Vatican II mess" in terms of canonical
status as with St. Athanasius [WHO while acknowledging Pope Liberius,
but " he went into the dioceses of bishops who were not acting as good
shepherds, to give the people the instruction, the sacramental grace,
and the pastors that they needed. For one bishop to intrude into the
diocese of another is a very serious matter. It can only be justified if
there is a state of necessity" without apparently the pope's support ?
“David
thought the feeding of his body was cause sufficient to break the law
of ... (as he said) “it was a case of necessity, the danger was so
present"
"The law of God and nature frees us in positive laws from guilt, in case of necessity, as David did lawfully eat showbread"
Do
the teachings of Aquinas on "necessity knows no law” or "case of
necessity" apply to "the entire Vatican II mess" in terms of canonical
status as with King David?
St. Thomas Aquinas: Catena Aurea - Gospel of Matthew
https://www.ccel.org › ccel › aquinas › catena1.ii.xii.html
...
by David who was not a Priest, and was a case of necessity; but this
second is done every sabbath, and by the Priests, and according to the
Law.
When is it Okay to Go to an SSPX Mass?
Comments