Skip to main content

Pidal - El padre Las Casas, su doble personalidad: "Las Casas..oozes bitter hatred and false exaggeration..He was neither a saint, nor an impostor, nor a malevolent man, nor a madman; he was simply paranoid"

https://ia902805.us.archive.org/8/items/elpadrelascasass00mene/elpadrelascasass00mene.pdf

This lack of perspective we notice results in credulous biographies presenting Las Casas as an isolated figure, as he always presents himself, standing out among his contemporaries, whom he deformedly diminished. I am fortunate not to have initially encountered Las Casas alone, but rather in comparison with other contemporaries; I did not suffer the fascinating charm of the praising siren, because my ears were plugged with the careful reasoning of Fray Francisco de Vitoria and the soldierly tales of Bernal Díaz del Castillo; then Las Casas, next to the great theologians, shrinks extraordinarily, and next to the honorable conquistadors, he oozes bitter hatred and false exaggeration.

[...]

The change I am undertaking is also ungrateful, because I see the danger that this critical rectification will be judged as an anti-Las Casas sentiment, a patriotic vindication of Spain's work in America. But this danger is not enough to silence criticism, which, for its part, is always ready to acknowledge that the rapid Spanish conquest of the New World, as if it were carried out in haste, had many defects that we should not forget, but rather understand. This book has nothing to do with the Black Legend or the Golden Legend, both of which are false.

It is a history book. We should applaud the fact that Charles V allowed Las Casas freedom of accusation, regardless of whether the accusation was defamatory or not; but at the same time, let us lament the religious pusillanimity that followed, which prohibited the few adequate rectifications that were written. But, in short, let us leave this apathetic indifference alone, very Spanish indeed; Let us not think about the Black Legend or the Golden Legend, but rather think a lot about the impartial historical criticism of our American enterprise, to shed light on our conduct then and now.

[...]

And with this, we find ourselves once again faced with Quintana's great antinomy: the perfectly orthodox, virtuous, enthusiastically zealous ecclesiastic incurs several anti-Christian notes and abounds in the most horrendous accusations. Not for a moment is it possible to think that Fray Bartolomé was a fraud, a pretender, a vile soul. I also find the attitude of some ecclesiastical critics (Fathers Bayle and Sáenz) who horrifiedly condemn such a lack of Christian charity in Las Casas or who call him a madman to be inaccurate. He was neither a saint, nor an impostor, nor a malevolent man, nor a madman; he was simply paranoid. The reality is that in the priest Las Casas, not only good actions coexist with those that are simply flawed, but also virtuous actions with anti-Christian and perverse ones. So, to excuse the total lack of charity, the monstrous and stubborn falsehood in a man of religiously ascetic life, one must not resort to the sly trickery of falsehood practiced by Quintana and all the other biographers; one must resort to the only possible explanation: mental illness.

[...]

In Las Casas, normal and abnormal activity coexist. This is the shift I believe is necessary to give to the biography; a shift whose new data and interpretive assessments, so different from the usual, I entrust to the examination of psychologists and historians. I have written these pages with reluctance, because, in them, Las Casas is presented to us in adverse light much more frequently than in favorable ones. And this cannot be otherwise: Las Casas's entire public life and all of his countless writings concern the Indians, and the writings completely distorted by the abnormal fixed idea, those that have had worldwide resonance, are those that have determined Las Casas's only outstanding work, while the other writings, in which abnormality appears only occasionally, barely give us biographical notes on Las Casas's activity free from false prejudice, so the normal Las Casas almost never appears before our eyes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Might Biden be a Liar & Predator like McCarrick?

September 15, 2020   Everyone knows that sexual predator ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick is a liar. His whole life was a lie of betrayal of the most sacred vows he took and the violation of the moral tenets of the Catholic faith which he desecrated. Most people don't realize that part of this desecration of lies included lying for "gravely sinful" Democrats like Joe Biden. McCarrick protected Biden when then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later to be Pope Benedict XVI) wrote that bishops were not to admit to Communion politicians like "gravely sinful" Biden who supports the killing of unborn babies. McCarrick lied for politicians like Biden by ignoring the important parts of the Ratzinger letter and told bishops not to ignore the Catholic Church law.  Last year, Fr. Robert Morey denied Holy Communion to the “gravely sinful” Biden following a "2004 decree signed jointly by the bishops of ...

The Biben Lying Machine: "Joe , do you know what else is a Sin besides Killing Babies? Lying... "

October 09, 2020   It appears that Joe Biden was even a lying machine in 2008 according to the post " Media Ignores Biden Repeatedly Lies During 'Meet the Press' Interview" on the Weasel Zippers website: Joe Biden Repeatedly Lies During "Meet the Press" Interview, Claims he Doesn't Support Taxpayer Funded Abortions.....   Joe, do you know what else is a sin besides killing babies? Lying... ... Joe Biden repeatedly made the claim in a Sunday interview on the NBC political show "Meet the Press" that he opposes taxpayer funding of abortions. However, a look at his voting record over the years reveals numerous instances where Barack Obama's pro-abortion running mate did exactly that. "I don't support public, public funding. I don't, because that flips the burden. That's then telling me I have to accept a different view," he said on the program. As recently as February, Biden voted against an amendmen...

Vox Cantoris vs. Aqua

The Catholic Monitor commenter Aqua had this to say to the Vox Cantoris website: Aqua said… Fred, your topic here reminds me of a dust-up, a few days ago, on Vox Cantoris. He asserted that it is our duty as Christians to wear masks to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass if the government tells us we must, or they will close our Churches. My response to him was that I find it inconceivable that an orthodox Catholic, such as himself, would ever submit to unjust dictates from secular government over how we approach Our Lord in Holy Mass. My response to him was that the Mass belongs to Catholics and we decide, within the bounds of Tradition, and in accord with the Word of Jesus, how we conduct ourselves in Holy Mass. Only one authority prevails over Mass and that is our God and the Sacred Tradition given by Him to guide us in all times and places. Understand, there is nothing inherently wrong with wearing a mask to Mass. But there is EVERYTHING wrong with wearing a symbol...