Skip to main content

The historian and writer Juan Miguel Zunzunegui recently gave a lecture at the Rafael del Pino Foundation, titled "Righteous We Were Empire". In it, Zunzunegui explored one of the subjects that he and his followers are passionate about: the shared history of Spain and America, and how this union gave rise to a rich and diverse civilisation that endures to this day.

https://frdelpino.es/en_gb/conference/master-conference-juan-miguel-zunzunegui/

Just We Were Empire": A Reflection on Hispanic Heritage and Common Cultural Inheritance

The historian and writer Juan Miguel Zunzunegui recently gave a lecture at the Rafael del Pino Foundation, titled "Righteous We Were Empire". In it, Zunzunegui explored one of the subjects that he and his followers are passionate about: the shared history of Spain and America, and how this union gave rise to a rich and diverse civilisation that endures to this day.

An Empire We Were Together

From the outset, Zunzunegui emphasised that the term empire should not be seen as a unilateral conquest, but as a joint construction. "Together we were empire", he insisted, explaining that the expansion of Spanish culture in America was not only a transfer of ideas, religion and language, but an exchange in which both sides, Europe and America, benefited and evolved. America received a linguistic and religious structure, but also moulded this heritage, creating what he describes as "little Spains" that adopted Spanish traditions in their own distinctive ways.

Demystifying the Conquest

One of the central points of the conference was to demystify some of the most entrenched and often misunderstood ideas about the conquest of America. The dominant narrative, driven by the black legend and discourses of guilt, according to Zunzunegui, tends to see the Spanish conquest as an episode exclusively of violence and subjugation. However, he proposes that it was, above all, an "inevitable encounter" between two worlds that culminated in the emergence of a mestizo civilisation. He stressed that, although there were dark episodes, many indigenous peoples chose to ally themselves with the Spanish in their struggle against the dominant indigenous empires, such as the Mexica, and that after the initial conflict, a plural and mestizo society was built.

Language as a Common Homeland

Zunzunegui emphasised that Hispanidad is much more than a legacy of colonisation: it is a shared identity that unites more than 550 million people. The Spanish language thus becomes a cultural homeland, a place where values, beliefs and a common worldview converge. "There is no stronger homeland than language," he said, insisting that the richness of the Spanish language lies not only in its words, but in how it has served as a vehicle for expressing the identity, faith and emotions of millions of people in different latitudes.

A Call for Unity in Diversity

Zunzunegui concluded his talk with a vision for the future, in which he argued that the true strength of the Hispanic American peoples and Spain lies in their cultural union. He proposed that, although the empire is in the past, there is a unique opportunity to build a future based on understanding and cooperation between the countries that share the Hispanic heritage. In his words, "it is not about recovering the past, but about building the future together", noting that a united Hispanic civilisation would have a fundamental and powerful role on the global stage.

Zunzunegui's lecture invites us to reflect on how hispanidad is a legacy that transcends geographical and temporal borders. It is not simply a history of conquest or colonisation, but the history of a shared identity, a rich mix of cultures that has survived time and distance. The common language and culture give us the opportunity to build bridges between the past and the future, and to recognise ourselves, both in America and in Spain, as part of a civilisation that still has much to offer the world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Might Biden be a Liar & Predator like McCarrick?

September 15, 2020   Everyone knows that sexual predator ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick is a liar. His whole life was a lie of betrayal of the most sacred vows he took and the violation of the moral tenets of the Catholic faith which he desecrated. Most people don't realize that part of this desecration of lies included lying for "gravely sinful" Democrats like Joe Biden. McCarrick protected Biden when then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later to be Pope Benedict XVI) wrote that bishops were not to admit to Communion politicians like "gravely sinful" Biden who supports the killing of unborn babies. McCarrick lied for politicians like Biden by ignoring the important parts of the Ratzinger letter and told bishops not to ignore the Catholic Church law.  Last year, Fr. Robert Morey denied Holy Communion to the “gravely sinful” Biden following a "2004 decree signed jointly by the bishops of ...

The Biben Lying Machine: "Joe , do you know what else is a Sin besides Killing Babies? Lying... "

October 09, 2020   It appears that Joe Biden was even a lying machine in 2008 according to the post " Media Ignores Biden Repeatedly Lies During 'Meet the Press' Interview" on the Weasel Zippers website: Joe Biden Repeatedly Lies During "Meet the Press" Interview, Claims he Doesn't Support Taxpayer Funded Abortions.....   Joe, do you know what else is a sin besides killing babies? Lying... ... Joe Biden repeatedly made the claim in a Sunday interview on the NBC political show "Meet the Press" that he opposes taxpayer funding of abortions. However, a look at his voting record over the years reveals numerous instances where Barack Obama's pro-abortion running mate did exactly that. "I don't support public, public funding. I don't, because that flips the burden. That's then telling me I have to accept a different view," he said on the program. As recently as February, Biden voted against an amendmen...

Vox Cantoris vs. Aqua

The Catholic Monitor commenter Aqua had this to say to the Vox Cantoris website: Aqua said… Fred, your topic here reminds me of a dust-up, a few days ago, on Vox Cantoris. He asserted that it is our duty as Christians to wear masks to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass if the government tells us we must, or they will close our Churches. My response to him was that I find it inconceivable that an orthodox Catholic, such as himself, would ever submit to unjust dictates from secular government over how we approach Our Lord in Holy Mass. My response to him was that the Mass belongs to Catholics and we decide, within the bounds of Tradition, and in accord with the Word of Jesus, how we conduct ourselves in Holy Mass. Only one authority prevails over Mass and that is our God and the Sacred Tradition given by Him to guide us in all times and places. Understand, there is nothing inherently wrong with wearing a mask to Mass. But there is EVERYTHING wrong with wearing a symbol...