Two essays stand out, at least to this reviewer. John Lamont’s contribution, a defence of the work of Michel Villey on objective right, perhaps deserves special mention for making Villey, who remains largely untranslated, much more accessible to the English world. Not only does Lamont offer an impressive summary of Villey’s views on objective rights, he also seriously challenges the dismissal of Villey by most English speaking scholars. This defence, like Villey’s work, occurs along both historical and philosophical axes. Villey’s case, as he presents it, is trenchant: that objective rights exist, whereas subjective rights do not, and that the organisation of much of the modern world around subjective rights is damaging. This seems to me an extremely important discussion for legal and political theory (although it neglects to mention Hegel’s notion of objective rights
https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1032&context=solidarity
Comments