Skip to main content

John Selden protestant against Catholic sacramental theology of marriage, advocating for a legal understanding of it. Search only for John Selden protest against Catholic sacramental theology of marriage, advocating for a legal understanding of it. AI Overview John Selden (1584–1654), a renowned English jurist and scholar, challenged the Catholic sacramental theology of marriage by advocating for a legal, contractual understanding based on historical, biblical, and natural law. In his works, particularly Uxor Ebraica (1646), Selden argued that marriage was not an indissoluble sacrament governed by ecclesiastical law, but rather a civil contract subject to state legislation and natural law. Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs +3 Key Aspects of Selden's Challenge: Rejection of Sacramental Marriage: Selden strongly opposed the medieval Catholic view that marriage is an ecclesial sacrament (a sign conveying grace) and therefore indissoluble by any human authority. Advocacy for Civil Contract: He championed the view that marriage is a civil contract (a conjugal society) that belongs under the jurisdiction of the state, not the church. "Uxor Ebraica" (1646): This monumental study of Jewish matrimonial law used rabbinic sources to show that ancient, legitimate, and divinely sanctioned marriage was a legal, non-sacramental arrangement that allowed for relatively straightforward dissolution and divorce. Natural Law and Noahide Laws: Selden argued that marriage is governed by "natural law"—which he believed to be the divine commands given to Adam and Noah, applicable to all humanity, rather than ecclesiastical canon law. Protestant Context: His views aligned with broader Protestant efforts to shift matrimonial jurisdiction from the church to the state, supporting the idea that marriage was a legal contract often dissoluble under specific circumstances. Influence on Milton: Selden's work heavily influenced John Milton's pro-divorce treatises, as both argued for a more flexible, non-sacramental understanding of marriage. Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs +7 By arguing that "of all actions of a man's life his marriage does least concern other people, yet of all actions of our life 'tis most meddled with by other people," Selden championed the "liberty" of the individual in matters of contract against church intervention. Wikiquote Wikiquote +2


AI Overview
John Selden (1584–1654), a renowned English jurist and scholar, challenged the Catholic sacramental theology of marriage by advocating for a legal, contractual understanding based on historical, biblical, and natural law. In his works, particularly Uxor Ebraica (1646), Selden argued that marriage was not an indissoluble sacrament governed by ecclesiastical law, but rather a civil contract subject to state legislation and natural law.
Key Aspects of Selden's Challenge:
  • Rejection of Sacramental Marriage: Selden strongly opposed the medieval Catholic view that marriage is an ecclesial sacrament (a sign conveying grace) and therefore indissoluble by any human authority.
  • Advocacy for Civil Contract: He championed the view that marriage is a civil contract (a conjugal society) that belongs under the jurisdiction of the state, not the church.
  • "Uxor Ebraica" (1646): This monumental study of Jewish matrimonial law used rabbinic sources to show that ancient, legitimate, and divinely sanctioned marriage was a legal, non-sacramental arrangement that allowed for relatively straightforward dissolution and divorce.
  • Natural Law and Noahide Laws: Selden argued that marriage is governed by "natural law"—which he believed to be the divine commands given to Adam and Noah, applicable to all humanity, rather than ecclesiastical canon law.

  • AI Overview
    John Selden (1584–1654), a renowned English jurist and scholar, challenged the Catholic sacramental theology of marriage by advocating for a legal, contractual understanding based on historical, biblical, and natural law. In his works, particularly Uxor Ebraica (1646), Selden argued that marriage was not an indissoluble sacrament governed by ecclesiastical law, but rather a civil contract subject to state legislation and natural law.
    Key Aspects of Selden's Challenge:
    • Rejection of Sacramental Marriage: Selden strongly opposed the medieval Catholic view that marriage is an ecclesial sacrament (a sign conveying grace) and therefore indissoluble by any human authority.
    • Advocacy for Civil Contract: He championed the view that marriage is a civil contract (a conjugal society) that belongs under the jurisdiction of the state, not the church.
    • "Uxor Ebraica" (1646): This monumental study of Jewish matrimonial law used rabbinic sources to show that ancient, legitimate, and divinely sanctioned marriage was a legal, non-sacramental arrangement that allowed for relatively straightforward dissolution and divorce.
    • Natural Law and Noahide Laws: Selden argued that marriage is governed by "natural law"—which he believed to be the divine commands given to Adam and Noah, applicable to all humanity, rather than ecclesiastical canon law.
    • Protestant Context: His views aligned with broader Protestant efforts to shift matrimonial jurisdiction from the church to the state, supporting the idea that marriage was a legal contract often dissoluble under specific circumstances.
    • Influence on Milton: Selden's work heavily influenced John Milton's pro-divorce treatises, as both argued for a more flexible, non-sacramental understanding of marriage.
    By arguing that "of all actions of a man's life his marriage does least concern other people, yet of all actions of our life 'tis most meddled with by other people," Selden championed the "liberty" of the individual in matters of contract against church intervention.
     +2n.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Vox Cantoris vs. Aqua

The Catholic Monitor commenter Aqua had this to say to the Vox Cantoris website: Aqua said… Fred, your topic here reminds me of a dust-up, a few days ago, on Vox Cantoris. He asserted that it is our duty as Christians to wear masks to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass if the government tells us we must, or they will close our Churches. My response to him was that I find it inconceivable that an orthodox Catholic, such as himself, would ever submit to unjust dictates from secular government over how we approach Our Lord in Holy Mass. My response to him was that the Mass belongs to Catholics and we decide, within the bounds of Tradition, and in accord with the Word of Jesus, how we conduct ourselves in Holy Mass. Only one authority prevails over Mass and that is our God and the Sacred Tradition given by Him to guide us in all times and places. Understand, there is nothing inherently wrong with wearing a mask to Mass. But there is EVERYTHING wrong with wearing a symbol...
9 comments
Read more

Some Reasons we should Vote for Huckabee instead of Paul

Some Reasons we should Vote for Huckabee instead of Paul Here are some reasons to get behind Huckabee from catholicsforhuckabee.blogspot.com. Fred For some reason, this year’s slot of Republicans has included a few surprisingly decent candidates, the like of which we have not seen in a long time. In fact, some of us have forgotten what a real conservative is like, after the Bushes, the Doles and the Fords. To hear candidates seriously discussing concepts like eliminating the IRS, and giving more than lip service to the pro-life cause, would have been inconceivable in the last presidential election. However, some hard choices are going to have to be made and soon if we conservatives don’t want someone like Romney, Guiliani or Thompson to get the GOP nomination. Like it or not, we are going to have to unite behind one conservative candidate, capable of not only disposing of phonies like Romney or Guiliani, but also of going all the way to the White House in 2008. Cong. Paul, that most ve...
2 comments
Read more

Nocturia Management Tips -- Dr. Grace Prescott addresses nocturia—frequent nighttime urination—explaining its risks, debunking common myths, and presenting the ASIM method and supporting techniques to help reclaim uninterrupted sleep.

https://coconote.app/notes/1eef4468-3436-4f1a-a3e0-605134efdd8a Overview Dr. Grace Prescott addresses nocturia—frequent nighttime urination—explaining its risks, debunking common myths, and presenting the ASIM method and supporting techniques to help reclaim uninterrupted sleep. The Problem of Nocturia Nocturia refers to waking repeatedly at night to urinate, affecting up to 70% of adults over 60. It increases the risk of falls, cognitive decline, heart strain, and emotional distress. Causes include reduced nighttime ADH hormone, decreased bladder capacity, and fluid redistribution from swollen legs. Common Myths and Mistakes Drinking less water during the day can worsen nocturia by irritating the bladder and concentrating urine. Most cases are not caused by a small bladder, but by excessive nighttime urine production. Alcohol before bed both suppresses ADH and acts as a diuretic, increasing nighttime urination and disrupting sleep quality. The ASIM Hydration Method Adjust  hydrati...
Post a Comment
Read more