Skip to main content

Play advice: The main problem I see is too much back story or exposition. Many plays have exposition including mine (See Taylor in Viva) A play requires conflict--the sooner we get to the opening conflict the better. The opening conflict I see occurs in The Cortez.

Finally got down to reading the 4 scenes.  I made a few notes.
Appreciate the time and effort you put in on the project.
Your writing ability shines through in description of the events,
the characters and the era.

The main problem I see is too much back story or exposition.
Many plays have exposition including mine (See Taylor in Viva)
A play requires conflict--the sooner we get to the opening conflict
the better.  The opening conflict I see occurs in The Cortez.

Its possible that one Knight opposed Berenguera's appointment of
of Fernando--prior to assembly's approval.  Maybe even likely.
"He's too young". "inexperienced". We are dealing with a vicious
enemy.  The Knight speaks of cruelty, enslaving women etc, etc.

NOTE.  Berenguera can respond. She opens curtain.  TO: Knight:  Look out
here sir.  Show Fernando in prayer before the Madonna---for two hours.
Other Knights indignant at fellow Knight.  Some more arguments follow.
Until finally all assembly voices approve except 2 votes with Dona Barengeura.

To get to the Cortez scene.  I would reduce the the exposition as follows:

You do a good job in the back story in Scene One.  However, my
preference is for a modern day Narrator telling the story. That way
he or she can come on stage a number of times.  Also some 
theaters avoid one scene actors--to keep costs down.

This would also apply to 10 year old Fernando.  I would replace him 
with 16 year old Fernando.   Maybe he is asking Berenguera about
his illness when he was young.  She explains what happened, etc,

I would keep A/B Rodrigo Jiminez scene with 16 year old Fernando.
Also keep Fernando dialog with his Mother on his Grandfather.
And his uncles death.  That would lead up to the Cortez scene.

Scene 3,  I see Fernando's marriage occurring after 1 or 2 battles.

Bottom Line;  I would reduce the exposition.  I would keep sentences
short in dialog or exposition.  It is easier for the actors to say.
        
That's about it Fred.  Hope this helps.  

All the best,

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Vox Cantoris vs. Aqua

The Catholic Monitor commenter Aqua had this to say to the Vox Cantoris website: Aqua said… Fred, your topic here reminds me of a dust-up, a few days ago, on Vox Cantoris. He asserted that it is our duty as Christians to wear masks to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass if the government tells us we must, or they will close our Churches. My response to him was that I find it inconceivable that an orthodox Catholic, such as himself, would ever submit to unjust dictates from secular government over how we approach Our Lord in Holy Mass. My response to him was that the Mass belongs to Catholics and we decide, within the bounds of Tradition, and in accord with the Word of Jesus, how we conduct ourselves in Holy Mass. Only one authority prevails over Mass and that is our God and the Sacred Tradition given by Him to guide us in all times and places. Understand, there is nothing inherently wrong with wearing a mask to Mass. But there is EVERYTHING wrong with wearing a symbol...
9 comments
Read more

Might Biden be a Liar & Predator like McCarrick?

September 15, 2020   Everyone knows that sexual predator ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick is a liar. His whole life was a lie of betrayal of the most sacred vows he took and the violation of the moral tenets of the Catholic faith which he desecrated. Most people don't realize that part of this desecration of lies included lying for "gravely sinful" Democrats like Joe Biden. McCarrick protected Biden when then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later to be Pope Benedict XVI) wrote that bishops were not to admit to Communion politicians like "gravely sinful" Biden who supports the killing of unborn babies. McCarrick lied for politicians like Biden by ignoring the important parts of the Ratzinger letter and told bishops not to ignore the Catholic Church law.  Last year, Fr. Robert Morey denied Holy Communion to the “gravely sinful” Biden following a "2004 decree signed jointly by the bishops of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Scientific Realism and Antirealism

Scientific Realism and Antirealism Debates about scientific realism concern the extent to which we are entitled to hope or believe that science will tell us what the world is really like. Realists tend to be optimistic; antirealists do not. To a first approximation, scientific realism is the view that well-confirmed scientific theories are approximately true; the entities they postulate do exist; and we have good reason to believe their main tenets. Realists often add that, given the spectacular predictive, engineering, and theoretical successes of our best scientific theories, it would be miraculous were they not to be approximately correct. This natural line of thought has an honorable pedigree yet has been subject to philosophical dispute since modern science began. In the 1970s, a particularly strong form of scientific realism was advocated by Putnam, Boyd, and others. When scientific realism is mentioned in the literature, usually some version of this is intended. It is often char...
Post a Comment
Read more