AI Overview These phrases juxtapose two major philosophical critiques: Jeremy Bentham's blistering rejection of natural human rights and a polarized debate over whether a theologian’s legacy can be rescued.1. "Rights... Bentham nonsense on stilts..."This is a reference to the famous critique of natural rights by the English utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham. In his 1796 essay Anarchical Fallacies (a direct critique of the French Declaration of the Rights of Man), Bentham famously dismissed the idea of unalienable, pre-legal "natural" rights. He declared that legal rights are the sole creation of the sovereign state, and that claiming natural rights that exist independently of the law is "rhetorical nonsense—nonsense upon stilts".2. "...Hauerwas..."This refers to Stanley Hauerwas, a highly influential contemporary Christian ethicist and theologian at Duke Divinity School. Known for his radical pacifism, virtue ethics, and arguments that the church must act as a political alternative to secular nations, he is frequently cited as a major disruptor of mainstream Christian social ethics.3. "...too toxic to be redeemed..."This phrase reflects fierce debates surrounding Hauerwas's controversial positions on specific issues—such as his defense of Christian non-involvement in liberal democracies, and intense modern critiques over how he handled the legacy and sexual misconduct of his close colleague, John Howard Yoder. Critics have argued that his theological shielding or mishandling of the Yoder abuse crisis rendered his ethical approach "too toxic to be redeemed," though many others continue to find profound value in his broader body of work on Christian discipleship.
AI Overview
These phrases juxtapose two major philosophical critiques: Jeremy Bentham's blistering rejection of natural human rights and a polarized debate over whether a theologian’s legacy can be rescued. [1, 2, 3]
1. "Rights... Bentham nonsense on stilts..."
This is a reference to the famous critique of natural rights by the English utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham. In his 1796 essay Anarchical Fallacies (a direct critique of the French Declaration of the Rights of Man), Bentham famously dismissed the idea of unalienable, pre-legal "natural" rights. He declared that legal rights are the sole creation of the sovereign state, and that claiming natural rights that exist independently of the law is "rhetorical nonsense—nonsense upon stilts". [1, 2, 3, 4]
This is a reference to the famous critique of natural rights by the English utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham. In his 1796 essay Anarchical Fallacies (a direct critique of the French Declaration of the Rights of Man), Bentham famously dismissed the idea of unalienable, pre-legal "natural" rights. He declared that legal rights are the sole creation of the sovereign state, and that claiming natural rights that exist independently of the law is "rhetorical nonsense—nonsense upon stilts". [1, 2, 3, 4]
2. "...Hauerwas..."
This refers to Stanley Hauerwas, a highly influential contemporary Christian ethicist and theologian at Duke Divinity School. Known for his radical pacifism, virtue ethics, and arguments that the church must act as a political alternative to secular nations, he is frequently cited as a major disruptor of mainstream Christian social ethics. [1, 2, 3, 4]
This refers to Stanley Hauerwas, a highly influential contemporary Christian ethicist and theologian at Duke Divinity School. Known for his radical pacifism, virtue ethics, and arguments that the church must act as a political alternative to secular nations, he is frequently cited as a major disruptor of mainstream Christian social ethics. [1, 2, 3, 4]
3. "...too toxic to be redeemed..."
This phrase reflects fierce debates surrounding Hauerwas's controversial positions on specific issues—such as his defense of Christian non-involvement in liberal democracies, and intense modern critiques over how he handled the legacy and sexual misconduct of his close colleague, John Howard Yoder. Critics have argued that his theological shielding or mishandling of the Yoder abuse crisis rendered his ethical approach "too toxic to be redeemed," though many others continue to find profound value in his broader body of work on Christian discipleship. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
This phrase reflects fierce debates surrounding Hauerwas's controversial positions on specific issues—such as his defense of Christian non-involvement in liberal democracies, and intense modern critiques over how he handled the legacy and sexual misconduct of his close colleague, John Howard Yoder. Critics have argued that his theological shielding or mishandling of the Yoder abuse crisis rendered his ethical approach "too toxic to be redeemed," though many others continue to find profound value in his broader body of work on Christian discipleship. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Comments