Skip to main content

Father Ernest Fortin’s critique of the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II) is a direct application of his broader skepticism toward modern human rights. Influenced by the political philosopher Leo Strauss, Fortin did not view the Council as an outright heresy (like some radical traditionalists), but rather as an intellectual miscalculation. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] His central argument was that Vatican II—in its desire to open a dialogue with the modern world—uncritically adopted secular Enlightenment philosophies, resulting in documents that were intellectually confused and pastorally naive. Fortin was highly critical of how the "Spirit of Vatican II" took over the post-conciliar Church. Because the actual Council documents were compromise texts—blending traditional theology with modern liberal vocabulary—they were inherently ambiguous.

Google AI: Father Ernest Fortin’s critique of the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II) is a direct application of his broader skepticism toward modern human rights. Influenced by the political philosopher Leo Strauss, Fortin did not view the Council as an outright heresy (like some radical traditionalists), but rather as an intellectual miscalculation. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
His central argument was that Vatican II—in its desire to open a dialogue with the modern world—uncritically adopted secular Enlightenment philosophies, resulting in documents that were intellectually confused and pastorally naive. [1, 2, 3]

1. The Naive Optimism of Gaudium et Spes
Fortin reserved his sharpest academic critiques for Gaudium et Spes (The Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World). [1, 2, 3]
  • The "Progress" Myth: Fortin argued that the document bought into a deeply un-Christian, 1960s secular optimism regarding technological, social, and moral progress. [1]
  • Ignoring Original Sin: By looking at the modern world with such enthusiasm, Fortin believed the Council Fathers downplayed the reality of human sin, the tragedy of history, and the radical difference between the City of God and the City of Man (an Augustinian concept he championed). [1]
2. The Theoretical Flaws of Dignitatis Humanae
Vatican II’s Declaration on Religious Freedom, Dignitatis Humanae, was another primary target for Fortin. [1]
  • Smuggling in Liberal Autonomy: The document argues that religious freedom is a right rooted in the "dignity of the human person." Fortin noted that while the Church meant the classical Christian view of dignity (which comes from being made in the image of God to pursue truth), the text used the exact language of modern liberal philosophy. [1, 2, 3]
  • The Collision of Concepts: In modern political thought (descending from Hobbes and Locke), a "right" implies absolute individual autonomy—the freedom to choose without a duty to an objective moral order. Fortin argued that by using this vocabulary, Vatican II tried to marry two incompatible concepts: traditional Catholic teleology (man’s duty to seek the true God) and modern liberalism (man’s right to be left alone). [1, 2]
3. The Problem of "Eisegesis" (Reading into the Texts)
Fortin was highly critical of how the "Spirit of Vatican II" took over the post-conciliar Church. Because the actual Council documents were compromise texts—blending traditional theology with modern liberal vocabulary—they were inherently ambiguous. [1, 2, 3]
  • Fortin observed that progressive theologians easily weaponized this ambiguity to push for sweeping secularization and liturgical changes that the Council never actually authorized. [1, 2]
  • He argued that the Council, by abandoning the precise, rigorous language of Scholasticism in favor of a softer, "pastoral" style, stripped the Church of its primary defense mechanism against secularism. [1]
4. Loss of the "Transpolitical" Nature of Christianity
Ultimately, Fortin believed Vatican II weakened the Church’s stance as a transpolitical entity. [1]
  • Historically, Christianity critiqued all political regimes from the standpoint of eternity.
  • By framing its moral theology around "human rights" and political activism, the post-Vatican II Church risked turning itself into just another non-governmental organization (NGO) fighting for secular political causes, abandoning its primary mission: the salvation of souls. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Summary: Fortin's Verdict on the Council

Fortin did not want a return to an rigid, unthinking pre-Vatican II mindset. However, he believed the Council’s strategy was fatally flawed. Instead of transforming the modern world with Christian truth, the Church allowed itself to be transformed by modern political language. [1, 2]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Davis wrote in katharine the great, her 1979 unauthorized biography of katharine graham, owner of the washington post, that the cia ran an "operation mockingbird"

https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKdavisD.htm Deborah Davis is a journalist who has published articles in the  New York Times ,  Village Voice  and  Ramparts . In 1979 Davis published a book about  Katharine Graham  ( Katharine the Great ). The book also looked at the connections between  Philip Graham  and the  Central Intelligence Agency . According to Davis the owner of the  Washington Post  was a key figure in  Operation Mockingbird , a CIA program to influence the American media. According to Davis,  Cord Meyer  was Mockingbird's "principal operative". Davis also argued that  Deep Throat  was  Richard Ober . Later, she claimed the source of this claim was a senior official in the CIA. As she pointed out in  Katharine the Great : "The president also began to rely heavily upon the counsel of Richard Ober, Angleton's deputy, the man in the CIA most concerned with domestic counterintelligence, a...

Vox Cantoris vs. Aqua

The Catholic Monitor commenter Aqua had this to say to the Vox Cantoris website: Aqua said… Fred, your topic here reminds me of a dust-up, a few days ago, on Vox Cantoris. He asserted that it is our duty as Christians to wear masks to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass if the government tells us we must, or they will close our Churches. My response to him was that I find it inconceivable that an orthodox Catholic, such as himself, would ever submit to unjust dictates from secular government over how we approach Our Lord in Holy Mass. My response to him was that the Mass belongs to Catholics and we decide, within the bounds of Tradition, and in accord with the Word of Jesus, how we conduct ourselves in Holy Mass. Only one authority prevails over Mass and that is our God and the Sacred Tradition given by Him to guide us in all times and places. Understand, there is nothing inherently wrong with wearing a mask to Mass. But there is EVERYTHING wrong with wearing a symbol...

Nocturia Management Tips -- Dr. Grace Prescott addresses nocturia—frequent nighttime urination—explaining its risks, debunking common myths, and presenting the ASIM method and supporting techniques to help reclaim uninterrupted sleep.

https://coconote.app/notes/1eef4468-3436-4f1a-a3e0-605134efdd8a Overview Dr. Grace Prescott addresses nocturia—frequent nighttime urination—explaining its risks, debunking common myths, and presenting the ASIM method and supporting techniques to help reclaim uninterrupted sleep. The Problem of Nocturia Nocturia refers to waking repeatedly at night to urinate, affecting up to 70% of adults over 60. It increases the risk of falls, cognitive decline, heart strain, and emotional distress. Causes include reduced nighttime ADH hormone, decreased bladder capacity, and fluid redistribution from swollen legs. Common Myths and Mistakes Drinking less water during the day can worsen nocturia by irritating the bladder and concentrating urine. Most cases are not caused by a small bladder, but by excessive nighttime urine production. Alcohol before bed both suppresses ADH and acts as a diuretic, increasing nighttime urination and disrupting sleep quality. The ASIM Hydration Method Adjust  hydrati...