Skip to main content

In this critique, Seagrave argues that John Finnis (and similarly, classical personalists like Jacques Maritain), in their eagerness to construct a modern framework for universal human rights rooted in traditional Thomistic natural law, "too easily dismiss the Hobbesian legacy of modern natural rights doctrines."The Core of the CritiqueThe "Hobbesian Legacy": Thomas Hobbes radically redefined the classical understanding of natural law. In classical philosophy (e.g., Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas), "law" or "right" (jus) was an objective moral order or what is due to others based on virtue and the common good. Hobbes inverted this by arguing that a "right" is essentially an individual, subjective, and pre-political power—primarily the unlimited liberty toward self-preservation

The quote you referenced originates from the work of political theorist S.A. Seagrave (specifically in his book The Foundations of Natural Morality), where he critically evaluates how modern natural law thinkers handle the historical shift in the concept of rights. [1, 2]
In this critique, Seagrave argues that John Finnis (and similarly, classical personalists like Jacques Maritain), in their eagerness to construct a modern framework for universal human rights rooted in traditional Thomistic natural law, "too easily dismiss the Hobbesian legacy of modern natural rights doctrines." [1, 2]
The Core of the Critique
  • The "Hobbesian Legacy": Thomas Hobbes radically redefined the classical understanding of natural law. In classical philosophy (e.g., Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas), "law" or "right" (jus) was an objective moral order or what is due to others based on virtue and the common good. Hobbes inverted this by arguing that a "right" is essentially an individual, subjective, and pre-political power—primarily the unlimited liberty toward self-preservation. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • The Dismissal: Thinkers like John Finnis and Jacques Maritain attempt to argue that modern subjective "human rights" can seamlessly blend into the old classical-Christian natural law tradition without carrying the baggage of early modern individualism. [1]
  • Seagrave's Point: Seagrave suggests that you cannot simply adopt the modern language of individual "rights" without reckoning with its origin story. By ignoring how deeply intertwined modern rights talk is with the Hobbesian emphasis on individual autonomy, self-interest, and power over an objective moral order, Finnis and Maritain overlook a fundamental conceptual tension. [1, 2, 3]
Would you like to explore John Finnis's actual response to Hobbes in Natural Law and Natural Rights, or look deeper into how Jacques Maritain attempted to reconcile Thomism with the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights? [1, 2]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Davis wrote in katharine the great, her 1979 unauthorized biography of katharine graham, owner of the washington post, that the cia ran an "operation mockingbird"

https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKdavisD.htm Deborah Davis is a journalist who has published articles in the  New York Times ,  Village Voice  and  Ramparts . In 1979 Davis published a book about  Katharine Graham  ( Katharine the Great ). The book also looked at the connections between  Philip Graham  and the  Central Intelligence Agency . According to Davis the owner of the  Washington Post  was a key figure in  Operation Mockingbird , a CIA program to influence the American media. According to Davis,  Cord Meyer  was Mockingbird's "principal operative". Davis also argued that  Deep Throat  was  Richard Ober . Later, she claimed the source of this claim was a senior official in the CIA. As she pointed out in  Katharine the Great : "The president also began to rely heavily upon the counsel of Richard Ober, Angleton's deputy, the man in the CIA most concerned with domestic counterintelligence, a...

Vox Cantoris vs. Aqua

The Catholic Monitor commenter Aqua had this to say to the Vox Cantoris website: Aqua said… Fred, your topic here reminds me of a dust-up, a few days ago, on Vox Cantoris. He asserted that it is our duty as Christians to wear masks to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass if the government tells us we must, or they will close our Churches. My response to him was that I find it inconceivable that an orthodox Catholic, such as himself, would ever submit to unjust dictates from secular government over how we approach Our Lord in Holy Mass. My response to him was that the Mass belongs to Catholics and we decide, within the bounds of Tradition, and in accord with the Word of Jesus, how we conduct ourselves in Holy Mass. Only one authority prevails over Mass and that is our God and the Sacred Tradition given by Him to guide us in all times and places. Understand, there is nothing inherently wrong with wearing a mask to Mass. But there is EVERYTHING wrong with wearing a symbol...

Nocturia Management Tips -- Dr. Grace Prescott addresses nocturia—frequent nighttime urination—explaining its risks, debunking common myths, and presenting the ASIM method and supporting techniques to help reclaim uninterrupted sleep.

https://coconote.app/notes/1eef4468-3436-4f1a-a3e0-605134efdd8a Overview Dr. Grace Prescott addresses nocturia—frequent nighttime urination—explaining its risks, debunking common myths, and presenting the ASIM method and supporting techniques to help reclaim uninterrupted sleep. The Problem of Nocturia Nocturia refers to waking repeatedly at night to urinate, affecting up to 70% of adults over 60. It increases the risk of falls, cognitive decline, heart strain, and emotional distress. Causes include reduced nighttime ADH hormone, decreased bladder capacity, and fluid redistribution from swollen legs. Common Myths and Mistakes Drinking less water during the day can worsen nocturia by irritating the bladder and concentrating urine. Most cases are not caused by a small bladder, but by excessive nighttime urine production. Alcohol before bed both suppresses ADH and acts as a diuretic, increasing nighttime urination and disrupting sleep quality. The ASIM Hydration Method Adjust  hydrati...