Several historians, basing themselves on the testimony of none other than Cardinal Merry Del Val and Cardinal Matthieu in the last hundred years have sustained that that Conclave was marked by a remarkable occurrence, the veto by the Austrian Emperor, Franz Josef I, against one of the leading contenders, Cardinal Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro, the Secretary of State of Pope Leo XIII. The motivation of this intervention has been attributed by Msgr. Jouin and Craig Heimbichner (the latter in his book, Blood and Altar) to the association of Cardinal Rampolla with French Freemasonry. [Editor’s Note Sept 4, 2023: This veto is mentioned in the newspaper, The Sun (Christchurch, New Zealand), Volume VI, Issue 1838, 5 January 1920, Page 8.]
https://www.fromrome.info/2015/01/10/team-bergoglio-and-the-legacy-of-cardinal-mariano-rampolla-del-tindaro/
“Team Bergoglio” and the legacy of Cardinal Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro
Rome, January 10, 2015: It has been a little over 111 years ago, since another controversial Conclave met and elected a now famous Pope. That was the Conclave of August 1903, and the Cardinal elected was St. Giuseppe Sarto, who took the name Pius X.
Several historians, basing themselves on the testimony of none other than Cardinal Merry Del Val and Cardinal Matthieu in the last hundred years have sustained that that Conclave was marked by a remarkable occurrence, the veto by the Austrian Emperor, Franz Josef I, against one of the leading contenders, Cardinal Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro, the Secretary of State of Pope Leo XIII. The motivation of this intervention has been attributed by Msgr. Jouin and Craig Heimbichner (the latter in his book, Blood and Altar) to the association of Cardinal Rampolla with French Freemasonry. [Editor’s Note Sept 4, 2023: This veto is mentioned in the newspaper, The Sun (Christchurch, New Zealand), Volume VI, Issue 1838, 5 January 1920, Page 8.]
The curious Conclave of 1903 had a curious consequence: that during the reign of Pope St. Pius X, the followers of Cardinal Rampolla who were raised to the dignity of the episcopate, where ordained by the Pope, and those of the Pope by Cardinal Rampolla. In the first case, the co-consecrators were either both or at least in one individual, themselves bishops ordained by Cardinal Rampolla.
Does this indicate a sort of compromise in the Conclave itself, by which the Catholic Cardinals and the Cardinals who were Freemasons came to some agreement, not to contest the validity of the election of Pope St Pius X?
Cardinal Rampolla passed away suddenly on Dec. 16, 1913, exactly 23 years before the birthday of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, born Dec. 17, 1936.
In any event, it is noticeable that the members of “Team Bergoglio” can trace their episcopal lineage back to Cardinal Rampolla and Pope St. Pius X in such wise as to both seemingly confirm the existence of such a compromise and to mark “Team Bergoglio” as the ecclesiastical heirs of the legacy of Cardinal Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro.
But don’t take my word on it, go to catholic-hierarchy.org and check for yourself. Here I will summarize what I have found there among the lists of the episcopal lineages of the alleged members of “Team Bergoglio”.
An episcopal lineage is the list of names of the principal consecrators of each bishop in the line extending from the bishop ordained back to the Apostles. Episcopal lineages have been traced in the Roman Rite back to the 15th century. When reading a lineage, the first named is the one consecrated, the next his principal consecrator, the next the principal consecrator of the principal consecrator. When ordained a bishop, every bishop is ordained by 3 bishops, the principal and 2 co-consecrators, which are normally chosen by the individual to be ordained. This can, thus, give some indication of the allegiance of the one to be ordained to existing factions withing the Sacred Hierarchy.
Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio
His direct episcopal lineage can be traced thus: Jorge Mario Bergoglio was ordained a bishop on June 27, 1992, by
- Antonio Cardinal Quarracino † (1962)
Archbishop of Buenos Aires, whose principal consecrator was - Bishop Anunciado Serafini † (1935)
Bishop of Mercedes, whose principal consecrator was - Archbishop Zenobio Lorenzo Guilland † (1935)
Archbishop of Paraná, whose principal consecrator was - Archbishop Filippo Cortesi † (1921),
Titular Archbishop of Siraces, whose principal consecrator was - Antonio Cardinal Vico † (1898)
Cardinal-Bishop of Porto e Santa Rufina, whose principal consecrator was - Mariano Cardinal Rampolla del Tindaro † (1882)
Thus, Cardinal Bergoglio is a direct episcopal “descendant” and “heir” of the Rampolla legacy.
Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor
Next, the alleged ring-leader of “Team Bergoglio”, who was consecrated a bishop on Dec. 21, 1977, by
- Archbishop Michael George Bowen (1970)
Archbishop of Southwark, England, whose principal consecrator was - Archbishop Domenico Enrici † (1955)
Titular Archbishop of Ancusa, whose principal consecrator was - Archbishop Giovanni Battista Enrico Antonio Maria Montini † (1954)
Archbishop of Milano {Milan}, whose principal consecrator was - Eugène-Gabriel-Gervais-Laurent Cardinal Tisserant † (1937)
Cardinal-Bishop of Ostia, whose principal consecrator was - Eugenio Maria Giuseppe Giovanni Cardinal Pacelli † (1917)
Cardinal-Priest of Santi Giovanni e Paolo, whose principal consecrator was - Pope Benedict XV (1907)
(Giacomo Giambattista della Chiesa †)
Cardinal Giambattista della Chiesa was the personal secretary and close ally of Cardinal Rampolla, from the time that the latter was Apostolic Nuncio to Spain. Cardinal della Chiesa was ordained a bishop, however, by Pope St. Pius X.
Cardinal Christoph Schönborn
Next, one of the members of “Team Bergoglio”, whom Dr. Ivereigh names in his book, but whom is not one of the 4 who have made public denials, is the Cardinal of Vienna, who was consecrated a bishop on Sept. 29, 1991 by
- Hans Hermann Cardinal Groër, O.S.B. † (1986)
Archbishop of Wien {Vienna} whose principal consecrator was - Franz Cardinal König † (1952)
Archbishop Emeritus of Wien {Vienna}, whose principal consecrator was - Bishop Michael Memelauer † (1927)
Bishop of Sankt Pölten, whose principal consecrator was - Friedrich (Gustav) Cardinal Piffl † (1913)
Archbishop of Wien {Vienna}, whose principal consecrator was - Archbishop Raffaele Scapinelli di Leguigno † (1912)
Titular Archbishop of Laodicea in Syria, whose principal consecrator was - Rafael Cardinal Merry del Val y Zulueta † (1900)
Cardinal-Priest of Santa Prassede, whose principal consecrator was - Mariano Cardinal Rampolla del Tindaro † (1882)
Cardinal-Priest of Santa Cecilia
Thus, Cardinal Schönborn is a direct episcopal “descendant” and “heir” of the Cardinal Rampolla legacy.
Cardinal Santos Abril y Castelló
Next, one of the members of “Team Bergoglio”, whom Dr. Ivereigh names in his book, but whom is not one of the 4 who have made public denials, is the Cardinal-Archpriest of Santa Maria Maggiore, who was consecrated a bishop on June 16, 1985 by
- Agostino Cardinal Casaroli † (1967)
Cardinal-Bishop of Porto e Santa Rufina, whose principal consecrator was - Pope Paul VI (1954)
(Giovanni Battista Enrico Antonio Maria Montini †), whose principal consecrator was - Eugène-Gabriel-Gervais-Laurent Cardinal Tisserant † (1937)
Cardinal-Bishop of Ostia, whose principal consecrator was - Eugenio Maria Giuseppe Giovanni Cardinal Pacelli † (1917)
Cardinal-Priest of Santi Giovanni e Paolo, whose principal consecrator was - Pope Benedict XV (1907)
(Giacomo Giambattista della Chiesa †)
Cardinal Giambattista della Chiesa was the personal secretary and close ally of Cardinal Rampolla, from the time that the latter was Apostolic Nuncio to Spain. Cardinal della Chiesa was ordained a bishop, however, by Pope St. Pius X.
Other alleged members of the Team trace back to Cardinal Gasparri
Other alleged members of “Team Bergoglio” are Cardinals Godfreid Danneels, Karl Lehman and Walter Kasper all descend from Cardinal Pietro Gasparri, whose episcopal lineage does not cross Cardinal Rampolla. Similarly, Cardinal André Armand Vingt-Trois of Paris, another named member, who has made no public denials, traces his lineage back to Cardinal François-Marie-Benjamin Richard de la Vergne, who was the principal consecrator of Cardinal Gasparri.
However, Cardinal Pietro Gasparri himself has been accused of being a collaborator with Cardinal Rampolla in opposing the reforms of Pope St. Pius X, in particular, the effort to extirpate the heresy of Modernism among the upper clergy.
Other implicated Cardinals
The text of Ivereigh also implicates Cardinal Sean Patrick O’Malley of Boston, and the African Cardinals, such as Cardinal Napier of Durban. Both of these Cardinals have lineages tracing back to Cardinal Gaetano De Lai, both of whose co-consecrators were themselves consecrated principally by Cardinal Rampolla.
Comments