The right to sin as the cornerstone of human right?: Al Core claim of Hamish Faser: The writer argues that liberal democracy functions as a means by which modern man is enabled, even incited, to undo the work of redemption.Theological diagnosis: It repudiates the social kingship of the new Adam and proclaims the disobedience of our first parents — framing the Core claim: The speaker argues that liberal democracy functions as a means by which modern man is enabled, even incited, to undo the work of redemption.Theological diagnosis: It repudiates the social kingship of the new Adam and proclaims the disobedience of our first parents — framing the right to sin as the cornerstone of human rights.Societal consequence: This logic produces what the speaker calls a true post-Christian society, where rights are redefined apart from Christian redemption and holiness.Pastoral response (implied): Affirm Christ's social kingship, resist equating rights with a license to sin, and witness to redemptive truth in personal life and public engagement..Societal consequence: This logic produces what the speaker calls a true post-Christian society, where rights are redefined apart from Christian redemption and holiness.Pastoral response (implied): Affirm Christ's social kingship, resist equating rights with a license to sin, and witness to redemptive truth in personal life and public engagement.sist equating rights with a license to sin, and witness to redemptive truth in personal life and public engagement.
Al Core claim of Hamish Faser: The writer argues that liberal democracy functions as a means by which modern man is enabled, even incited, to undo the work of redemption.Theological diagnosis: It repudiates the social kingship of the new Adam and proclaims the disobedience of our first parents — framing the Core claim: The speaker argues that liberal democracy functions as a means by which modern man is enabled, even incited, to undo the work of redemption.Theological diagnosis: It repudiates the social kingship of the new Adam and proclaims the disobedience of our first parents — framing the right to sin as the cornerstone of human rights.Societal consequence: This logic produces what the speaker calls a true post-Christian society, where rights are redefined apart from Christian redemption and holiness.Pastoral response (implied): Affirm Christ's social kingship, resist equating rights with a license to sin, and witness to redemptive truth in personal life and public engagement..Societal consequence: This logic produces what the speaker calls a true post-Christian society, where rights are redefined apart from Christian redemption and holiness.Pastoral response (implied): Affirm Christ's social kingship, resist equating rights with a license to sin, and witness to redemptive truth in personal life and public engagement.
Comments