Skip to main content

The Influences: For Kalb's specific view on how Gilson "rushed to assimilate" the natural philosophy of Henri Bergson over Aristotle—which underpins the argument that Gilson veered away from traditional realism—you can reference his shorter programmatic discussions, such as his public exchanges on philosophical forums like The Smithy. [1]

In the philosophical framework of Thomist scholar Jeffrey C. Kalb Jr., the core target of critique is Étienne Gilson and his "Existential Thomism," which Kalb characterizes as a form of anti-essentialism rather than literal nominalism. [1, 2]
Kalb's view of these figures can be broken down as follows:
Étienne Gilson: Anti-Essentialism as "Semi-Nominalism"
In his book, Existence and Subsistence in St. Thomas Aquinas: Against Gilsonian Metaphysics, Kalb argues that Gilson's radical focus on the primacy of the act-of-being (esse) over essence led to an incomplete reading of Thomas Aquinas. [1, 2]
  • Kalb asserts that Gilson’s "anti-essentialist creed" overcorrects against rationalism.
  • By casting essence as a mere extrinsic limitation to existence (borrowing heavily from Henri Bergson's intuitionism), Gilson's philosophy inadvertently weakens the reality and stability of universal essences. While Gilson wouldn't call himself a nominalist, from Kalb's perspective, stripping essence of its proper ontological status functions as a conceptual cousin to nominalism (or semi-nominalism) by minimizing the intelligible structure of reality. [1, 2]
G.K. Chesterton: A Contrasting Realist Intuition
Kalb does not categorize G.K. Chesterton as a semi-nominalist. On the contrary, within the broader Thomist community that Kalb engages with, Chesterton is universally celebrated for his robust, common-sense metaphysical realism. [1]
  • Chesterton's famous biography of St. Thomas Aquinas (which Gilson himself praised as the best book ever written on the saint) centers entirely on a fierce defense of the reality of things against skepticism, idealism, and nominalism.
  • Where Kalb finds Gilson's scholarly existential Thomism to be sliding into a flawed anti-essentialism, Chesterton’s intuitive grasp of Aquinas is viewed as holding essence and existence together in a healthy, realist balance. [1]
If you are looking at a specific chapter or essay where Kalb unpacks these distinctions, please let me know the title of the paper or the specific argument you are referencing so I can provide a more tailored analysis!
William Desmond, Being and the Between - The Smithy
If you are looking at a specific chapter or essay where Kalb unpacks these distinctions, please let me know the title of the paper or the specific argument you are referencing so I can provide a more tailored analysis!

The previous summary directly mirrors the structural claims made by Jeffrey C. Kalb Jr. across his published work and online philosophical commentary, specifically focusing on his critique of "Existential Thomism". [1, 2]
If you want to map his exact vocabulary onto a specific text, the primary reference points are:
  • The Core Critique: The baseline argument regarding Étienne Gilson's "anti-essentialist creed" and how it acts as an inversion of traditional metaphysics is detailed thoroughly in Kalb's book, Existence and Subsistence in St. Thomas Aquinas: Against Gilsonian Metaphysics. [1, 2]
  • The Influences: For Kalb's specific view on how Gilson "rushed to assimilate" the natural philosophy of Henri Bergson over Aristotle—which underpins the argument that Gilson veered away from traditional realism—you can reference his shorter programmatic discussions, such as his public exchanges on philosophical forums like The Smithy. [1]
Are you analyzing a particular chapter of Against Gilsonian Metaphysics, or are you evaluating how Kalb's scientific background (materials science and electrical engineering) informs his view of intelligible essences? Let me know so we can focus on that specific text! [1, 2]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Davis wrote in katharine the great, her 1979 unauthorized biography of katharine graham, owner of the washington post, that the cia ran an "operation mockingbird"

https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKdavisD.htm Deborah Davis is a journalist who has published articles in the  New York Times ,  Village Voice  and  Ramparts . In 1979 Davis published a book about  Katharine Graham  ( Katharine the Great ). The book also looked at the connections between  Philip Graham  and the  Central Intelligence Agency . According to Davis the owner of the  Washington Post  was a key figure in  Operation Mockingbird , a CIA program to influence the American media. According to Davis,  Cord Meyer  was Mockingbird's "principal operative". Davis also argued that  Deep Throat  was  Richard Ober . Later, she claimed the source of this claim was a senior official in the CIA. As she pointed out in  Katharine the Great : "The president also began to rely heavily upon the counsel of Richard Ober, Angleton's deputy, the man in the CIA most concerned with domestic counterintelligence, a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Vox Cantoris vs. Aqua

The Catholic Monitor commenter Aqua had this to say to the Vox Cantoris website: Aqua said… Fred, your topic here reminds me of a dust-up, a few days ago, on Vox Cantoris. He asserted that it is our duty as Christians to wear masks to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass if the government tells us we must, or they will close our Churches. My response to him was that I find it inconceivable that an orthodox Catholic, such as himself, would ever submit to unjust dictates from secular government over how we approach Our Lord in Holy Mass. My response to him was that the Mass belongs to Catholics and we decide, within the bounds of Tradition, and in accord with the Word of Jesus, how we conduct ourselves in Holy Mass. Only one authority prevails over Mass and that is our God and the Sacred Tradition given by Him to guide us in all times and places. Understand, there is nothing inherently wrong with wearing a mask to Mass. But there is EVERYTHING wrong with wearing a symbol...
9 comments
Read more

Some Reasons we should Vote for Huckabee instead of Paul

Some Reasons we should Vote for Huckabee instead of Paul Here are some reasons to get behind Huckabee from catholicsforhuckabee.blogspot.com. Fred For some reason, this year’s slot of Republicans has included a few surprisingly decent candidates, the like of which we have not seen in a long time. In fact, some of us have forgotten what a real conservative is like, after the Bushes, the Doles and the Fords. To hear candidates seriously discussing concepts like eliminating the IRS, and giving more than lip service to the pro-life cause, would have been inconceivable in the last presidential election. However, some hard choices are going to have to be made and soon if we conservatives don’t want someone like Romney, Guiliani or Thompson to get the GOP nomination. Like it or not, we are going to have to unite behind one conservative candidate, capable of not only disposing of phonies like Romney or Guiliani, but also of going all the way to the White House in 2008. Cong. Paul, that most ve...
2 comments
Read more